Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhifa Ke

dblp:341/1319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 50% Reinforcement learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
finite-time analysis
0.812024
An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markovian sampling
0.812024
An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.812024
An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.812024
An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-asymptotic analysis · 0.8neural network function approximation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 An Improved Finite-time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Temporal difference (TD) learning algorithms with neural network function parameterization have well-established empirical success in many practical large-scale reinforcement learning tasks. However, theoretical understanding of these algorithms remains challenging due to the nonlinearity of the action-value approximation. In this paper, we develop an improved non-asymptotic analysis of the neural TD method with a general $L$-layer neural network. New proof techniques are developed and an improved new $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-1})$ sample complexity is derived. To our best knowledge, this is the first finite-time analysis of neural TD that achieves an $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-1})$ complexity under the Markovian sampling, as opposed to the best known $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-2})$ complexity in the existing literature.
Zhifa Ke, Zaiwen Wen, Junyu Zhang 0002
ICML1