EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Enrico Ventura
dblp:341/1327
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 50% Learning theory · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
statistical physics of learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical physics · 0.9random matrix theory · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusionabstractIn this paper, we investigate the latent geometry of generative diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis. For this purpose, we analyze the spectrum of eigenvalues (and singular values) of the Jacobian of the score function, whose discontinuities (gaps) reveal the presence and dimensionality of distinct sub-manifolds. Using a statistical physics approach, we derive the spectral distributions and formulas for the spectral gaps under several distributional assumptions, and we compare these theoretical predictions with the spectra estimated from trained networks. Our analysis reveals the existence of three distinct qualitative phases during the generative process: a trivial phase; a manifold coverage phase where the diffusion process fits the distribution internal to the manifold; a consolidation phase where the score becomes orthogonal to the manifold and all particles are projected on the support of the data. This `division of labor' between different timescales provides an elegant explanation of why generative diffusion models are not affected by the manifold overfitting phenomenon that plagues likelihood-based models, since the internal distribution and the manifold geometry are produced at different time points during generation. Enrico Ventura, Beatrice Achilli, Gianluigi Silvestri, Carlo Lucibello, Luca Ambrogioni |
ICLR | 1 |