Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dayal Singh Kalra
dblp:341/1483
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Trustworthy machine learning · 9% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
1.7 | 3 | 2025 | Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements · NeurIPS 2024 Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and width · NeurIPS 2023 Universal Sharpness Dynamics in Neural Network Training: Fixed Point Analysis, Edge of Stability, and Route to Chaos · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Universal Sharpness Dynamics in Neural Network Training: Fixed Point Analysis, Edge of Stability, and Route to Chaos · ICLR 2025 Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and width · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and width · NeurIPS 2023 Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
algorithmic reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | (How) Can Transformers Predict Pseudo-Random Numbers? · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | (How) Can Transformers Predict Pseudo-Random Numbers? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | (How) Can Transformers Predict Pseudo-Random Numbers? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sharpness reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › learning rate schedule
warm-up |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
edge of stability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and width · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and width · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hessian eigenvalue analysis · 1.5fixed point analysis · 0.9embedding analysis · 0.9chaos theory · 0.9attention analysis · 0.9loss catapult mechanism · 0.8adam · 0.8SGD · 0.8phase diagram analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Universal Sharpness Dynamics in Neural Network Training: Fixed Point Analysis, Edge of Stability, and Route to ChaosabstractIn gradient descent dynamics of neural networks, the top eigenvalue of the Hessian of the loss (sharpness) displays a variety of robust phenomena throughout training. This includes early time regimes where the sharpness may decrease during early periods of training (sharpness reduction), and later time behavior such as progressive sharpening and edge of stability. We demonstrate that a simple
-layer linear network (UV model) trained on a single training example exhibits all of the essential sharpness phenomenology observed in real-world scenarios. By analyzing the structure of dynamical fixed points in function space and the vector field of function updates, we uncover the underlying mechanisms behind these sharpness trends. Our analysis reveals (i) the mechanism behind early sharpness reduction and progressive sharpening, (ii) the required conditions for edge of stability, and (iii) a period-doubling route to chaos on the edge of stability manifold as learning rate is increased. Finally, we demonstrate that various predictions from this simplified model generalize to real-world scenarios and discuss its limitations. Dayal Singh Kalra, Tianyu He, Maissam Barkeshli |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | (How) Can Transformers Predict Pseudo-Random Numbers?abstractTransformers excel at discovering patterns in sequential data, yet their fundamental limitations and learning mechanisms remain crucial topics of investigation. In this paper, we study the ability of Transformers to learn pseudo-random number sequences from linear congruential generators (LCGs), defined by the recurrence relation $x_{t+1} = a x_t + c \;\mathrm{mod}\;{m}$. We find that with sufficient architectural capacity and training data variety, Transformers can perform in-context prediction of LCG sequences with unseen moduli ($m$) and parameters ($a,c$). By analyzing the embedding layers and attention patterns, we uncover how Transformers develop algorithmic structures to learn these sequences in two scenarios of increasing complexity. First, we investigate how Transformers learn LCG sequences with unseen ($a, c$) but fixed modulus; and demonstrate successful learning up to $m = 2^{32}$. We find that models learn to factorize $m$ and utilize digit-wise number representations to make sequential predictions. In the second, more challenging scenario of unseen moduli, we show that Transformers can generalize to unseen moduli up to $m_{\text{test}} = 2^{16}$. In this case, the model employs a two-step strategy: first estimating the unknown modulus from the context, then utilizing prime factorizations to generate predictions. For this task, we observe a sharp transition in the accuracy at a critical depth $d= 3$. We also find that the number of in-context sequence elements needed to reach high accuracy scales sublinearly with the modulus. Darshil Doshi, Dayal Singh Kalra, Tianyu He, Maissam Barkeshli |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Why Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and ImprovementsabstractIn modern deep learning, it is common to warm up the learning rate $\eta$, often by a linear schedule between $\eta_{\text{init}} = 0$ and a predetermined target $\eta_{\text{trgt}}$. In this paper, we show through systematic experiments with SGD and Adam that the overwhelming benefit of warmup arises from allowing the network to tolerate larger $\eta_{\text{trgt}}$ by forcing the network to more well-conditioned areas of the loss landscape. The ability to handle larger target learning rates in turn makes hyperparameter tuning more robust while improving the final performance of the network. We uncover different regimes of operation during the warmup period, depending on whether the network training starts off in a progressive sharpening or sharpness reduction phase, which in turn depends on the initialization and parameterization. Using these insights, we show how $\eta_{\text{init}}$ can be properly chosen by utilizing the loss catapult mechanism, which saves on the number of warmup steps, in some cases completely eliminating the need for warmup. We also suggest an initialization for the variance in Adam, which provides benefits similar to warmup. Dayal Singh Kalra, Maissam Barkeshli |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Phase diagram of early training dynamics in deep neural networks: effect of the learning rate, depth, and widthabstractWe systematically analyze optimization dynamics in deep neural networks (DNNs) trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and study the effect of learning rate $\eta$, depth $d$, and width $w$ of the neural network. By analyzing the maximum eigenvalue $\lambda^H_t$ of the Hessian of the loss, which is a measure of sharpness of the loss landscape, we find that the dynamics can show four distinct regimes: (i) an early time transient regime, (ii) an intermediate saturation regime, (iii) a progressive sharpening regime, and (iv) a late time "edge of stability" regime. The early and intermediate regimes (i) and (ii) exhibit a rich phase diagram depending on $\eta \equiv c / \lambda_0^H $, $d$, and $w$. We identify several critical values of $c$, which separate qualitatively distinct phenomena in the early time dynamics of training loss and sharpness. Notably, we discover the opening up of a "sharpness reduction" phase, where sharpness decreases at early times, as $d$ and $ 1/w$ are increased. Dayal Singh Kalra, Maissam Barkeshli |
NeurIPS | 1 |