Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruiyuan Huang
dblp:341/1632
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 67% Reinforcement learning · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | High Probability Bound for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Unknown Context Distributions · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
high-probability regret |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | High Probability Bound for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Unknown Context Distributions · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | High Probability Bound for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Unknown Context Distributions · ICML 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean spaces · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › data summarization › coresets
coreset construction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean spaces · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
euclidean clustering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean spaces · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak dependency analysis · 0.9martingale inequality refinement · 0.9lower bound analysis · 0.7coreset size bounds · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | High Probability Bound for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Unknown Context DistributionsabstractMotivated by applications in online bidding and sleeping bandits, we examine the problem of contextual bandits with cross learning, where the learner observes the loss associated with the action across all possible contexts, not just the current round’s context. Our focus is on a setting where losses are chosen adversarially, and contexts are sampled i.i.d. from a specific distribution. This problem was first studied by Balseiro et al. (2019), who proposed an algorithm that achieves near-optimal regret under the assumption that the context distribution is known in advance. However, this assumption is often unrealistic. To address this issue, Schneider & Zimmert (2023) recently proposed a new algorithm that achieves nearly optimal expected regret. It is well-known that expected regret can be significantly weaker than high-probability bounds. In this paper, we present a novel, in-depth analysis of their algorithm and demonstrate that it actually achieves near-optimal regret with high probability. There are steps in the original analysis by Schneider & Zimmert (2023) that lead only to an expected bound by nature. In our analysis, we introduce several new insights. Specifically, we make extensive use of the weak dependency structure between different epochs, which was overlooked in previous analyses. Additionally, standard martingale inequalities are not directly applicable, so we refine martingale inequalities to complete our analysis. Ruiyuan Huang, Zengfeng Huang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean spacesabstractWe consider the problem of constructing small coresets for $k$-Median in Euclidean spaces. Given a large set of data points $P\subset \mathbb{R}^d$, a coreset is a much smaller set $S\subset \mathbb{R}^d$, so that the $k$-Median costs of any $k$ centers w.r.t. $P$ and $S$ are close. Existing literature mainly focuses on the high-dimension case and there has been great success in obtaining dimension-independent bounds, whereas the case for small $d$ is largely unexplored. Considering many applications of Euclidean clustering algorithms are in small dimensions and the lack of systematic studies in the current literature, this paper investigates coresets for $k$-Median in small dimensions. For small $d$, a natural question is whether existing near-optimal dimension-independent bounds can be significantly improved. We provide affirmative answers to this question for a range of parameters. Moreover, new lower bound results are also proved, which are the highest for small $d$. In particular, we completely settle the coreset size bound for $1$-d $k$-Median (up to log factors). Interestingly, our results imply a strong separation between $1$-d $1$-Median and $1$-d $2$-Median. As far as we know, this is the first such separation between $k=1$ and $k=2$ in any dimension. Lingxiao Huang, Ruiyuan Huang, Zengfeng Huang, Xuan Wu 0002 |
ICML | 2 |