Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cheril Shah
dblp:341/3521
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education › automated assessment
automated essay scoring |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | H-AES: Towards Automated Essay Scoring for Hindi · AAAI 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
low-resource language processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | H-AES: Towards Automated Essay Scoring for Hindi · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.3feature-based machine learning · 1.3LSTM · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Correlations between Multilingual Language Model Geometry and Crosslingual Transfer PerformanceabstractA common approach to interpreting multilingual language models is to evaluate their internal representations. For example, studies have found that languages occupy distinct subspaces in the models’ representation spaces, and geometric distances between languages often reflect linguistic properties such as language families and typological features. In our work, we investigate whether geometric distances between language representations correlate with zero-shot crosslingual transfer performance for POS-tagging and NER in three multilingual language models. We consider four distance metrics, including new metrics that identify a basis for a multilingual representation space that sorts axes based on their language-separability. We find that each distance metric either only moderately correlates or does not correlate with crosslingual transfer performance, and metrics do not generalize well across models, layers, and tasks. Although pairwise language separability is a reasonable predictor of crosslingual transfer, representational geometry overall is an inconsistent predictor for the crosslingual performance of multilingual language models. Cheril Shah, Yashashree Chandak, Atharv Mahesh Mane, Ben Bergen 0001, Tyler A. Chang |
LREC/COLING | 1 |
| 2023 | H-AES: Towards Automated Essay Scoring for HindiabstractThe use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Automated Essay Scoring (AES) has been well explored in the English language, with benchmark models exhibiting performance comparable to human scorers. However, AES in Hindi and other low-resource languages remains unexplored. In this study, we reproduce and compare state-of-the-art methods for AES in the Hindi domain. We employ classical feature-based Machine Learning (ML) and advanced end-to-end models, including LSTM Networks and Fine-Tuned Transformer Architecture, in our approach and derive results comparable to those in the English language domain. Hindi being a low-resource language, lacks a dedicated essay-scoring corpus. We train and evaluate our models using translated English essays and empirically measure their performance on our own small-scale, real-world Hindi corpus. We follow this up with an in-depth analysis discussing prompt-specific behavior of different language models implemented. Shubhankar Singh, Anirudh Pupneja, Shivaansh Mital, Cheril Shah, Manish Bawkar, Lakshman Prasad Gupta, Ajit Kumar 0002, Yaman Singla, Rushali Gupta, Rajiv Ratn Shah |
AAAI | 4 |