We present PolyUFC, an MLIR based compilation flow for uncore frequency capping that combines (performance and power) roofline analyses and polyhedral compilation-based static analysis for characterization of affine programs. We introduce a parametric mathematical model that links operational intensity and uncore frequency to derive frequency caps, validated through empirical evaluation on real hardware. By embedding these caps into Pluto optimized code generated by Polygeist, we achieve improvements in Energy Delay Product (EDP) up to 42% on compute-bound, and up to 54% on bandwidth-bound programs—carefully selected from ML-models from vision/NLP domains and PolyBench—over Intel UFS driver. Our framework is retargetable across multiple micro-architectures; and can handle multiple optimization goals like performance, energy and EDP, and is applicable across inter/intra dialects.

For Affine Control Programs or Static Control Programs (SCoP), symbolic counting of reuse distances could induce polynomials for each reuse pair. These polynomials along with cache capacity constraints lead to non-affine (semi-algebraic) sets; and counting these sets is considered to be a hard problem. The state-of-the-art methods use various exact enumeration techniques relying on existing cardinality algorithms that can efficiently count affine sets. We propose BullsEye , a novel, scalable, accurate, and problem-size independent approximation framework. It is an analytical cache model for fully associative caches with LRU replacement policy focusing on sampling and linearization of non-affine stack distance polynomials. First, we propose a simple domain sampling method that can improve the scalability of exact enumeration. Second, we propose linearization techniques relying on Handelman’s theorem and Bernstein’s representation . To improve the scalability of the Handelman’s theorem linearization technique, we propose template (Interval or Octagon) sub-polyhedral approximations. Our methods obtain significant compile-time improvements with high-accuracy when compared to HayStack on important polyhedral compilation kernels such as nussinov , cholesky , and adi from PolyBench , and harris , gaussianblur from LLVM -TestSuite. Overall, on PolyBench kernels, our methods show up to 3.31× (geomean) speedup with errors below ≈ 0.08% (geomean) for the octagon sub-polyhedral approximation.