Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ivan Diaz

dblp:341/5515 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation
0.712023
Estimating Causal Effects Identifiable from a Combination of Observations and Experiments · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect identification
0.712023
Estimating Causal Effects Identifiable from a Combination of Observations and Experiments · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.712023
Estimating Causal Effects Identifiable from a Combination of Observations and Experiments · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
backdoor adjustment
0.212023
Estimating Causal Effects Identifiable from a Combination of Observations and Experiments · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multiply robust estimation · 0.7asymptotic analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Estimating Causal Effects Identifiable from a Combination of Observations and Experiments
abstract
Learning cause and effect relations is arguably one of the central challenges found throughout the data sciences. Formally, determining whether a collection of observational and interventional distributions can be combined to learn a target causal relation is known as the problem of generalized identification (or g-identification) [Lee et al., 2019]. Although g-identification has been well understood and solved in theory, it turns out to be challenging to apply these results in practice, in particular when considering the estimation of the target distribution from finite samples. In this paper, we develop a new, general estimator that exhibits multiply robustness properties for g-identifiable causal functionals. Specifically, we show that any g-identifiable causal effect can be expressed as a function of generalized multi-outcome sequential back-door adjustments that are amenable to estimation. We then construct a corresponding estimator for the g-identification expression that exhibits robustness properties to bias. We analyze the asymptotic convergence properties of the estimator. Finally, we illustrate the use of the proposed estimator in experimental studies. Simulation results corroborate the theory.
Yonghan Jung, Ivan Diaz, Jin Tian 0001, Elias Bareinboim
NeurIPS2