Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Schögler

dblp:341/5678 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security
automotive security
0.712023
A Systematic Approach to Automotive Security · FM 2023
Embedded and real-time systems
automotive systems
0.212023
A Systematic Approach to Automotive Security · FM 2023
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning single and compound-protocol automata and checking behavioral equivalences
abstract
Abstract This paper presents a method and a practical implementation that complements traditional conformance testing. We infer a Mealy state machine of the system-under-test using active automata learning. This automaton is checked for bisimulation with a specification automaton modeled after the standard, which provides a strong verdict of conformance or nonconformance. We further present a method to learn models of multiple communication protocols running on the same device using a dispatcher system in conjunction with the same automata learning algorithms. We subsequently use similar checking methods to compare it with separately learned models. This allows for determining whether there is some interference or interaction between those protocols. In the practical execution of the system, we concentrate on lower levels of the Near-Field Communication (NFC, ISO/IEC 14443-3) and the Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) protocols. As a by-product, we share some observations of the performance of different learning algorithms and calibrations in the specific setting of ISO/IEC 14443-3, which is the difficulty to learn models of systems that a) consist of two very similar structures and b) timeout very frequently, as well as the role of conformance testing for compound models and speed optimizations for time-sensitive protocols.
Stefan Marksteiner, David Schögler, Marjan Sirjani, Mikael Sjödin
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.2
2023 A Systematic Approach to Automotive Security
Masoud Ebrahimi 0002, Stefan Marksteiner, Dejan Nickovic, Roderick Bloem, David Schögler, Philipp Eisner, Samuel Sprung, Thomas Schober, Sebastian Chlup, Christoph Schmittner, Sandra König
FM5