Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Runqing Miao

dblp:341/6381 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 45% Language models and text generation · 24% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
hybrid reasoning
1.012026
Thinking-Based Non-Thinking: Solving the Reward Hacking Problem in Training Hybrid Reasoning Models via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
1.012026
Thinking-Based Non-Thinking: Solving the Reward Hacking Problem in Training Hybrid Reasoning Models via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
preference-based reinforcement learning
0.912025
Uncertainty-aware Preference Alignment for Diffusion Policies · NeurIPS 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.312025
Uncertainty-aware Preference Alignment for Diffusion Policies · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.0regret-based preference model · 0.9maximum posterior objective · 0.9diffusion policy · 0.9beta prior · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Thinking-Based Non-Thinking: Solving the Reward Hacking Problem in Training Hybrid Reasoning Models via Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Siyuan Gan, Jiaheng Liu, Boyan Wang, Tianpei Yang, Runqing Miao, Yuyao Zhang, Fanyu Meng, Junlan Feng, Linjian Meng, Jing Huo, Yang Gao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Siyuan Gan, Tianpei Yang, Runqing Miao, Junlan Feng, Linjian Meng, Jing Huo, Yang Gao 0001
ACL (1)5
2025 Uncertainty-aware Preference Alignment for Diffusion Policies
abstract
Recent advancements in diffusion policies have demonstrated promising performance in decision-making tasks. To align these policies with human preferences, a common approach is incorporating Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) into policy tuning. However, since preference data is practically collected from populations with different backgrounds, a key challenge lies in handling the inherent uncertainties in people's preferences during policy updates. To address this challenge, we propose the Diff-UAPA algorithm, designed for uncertainty-aware preference alignment in diffusion policies. Specifically, Diff-UAPA introduces a novel iterative preference alignment framework in which the diffusion policy adapts incrementally to preferences from different user groups. To accommodate this online learning paradigm, Diff-UAPA employs a maximum posterior objective, which aligns the diffusion policy with regret-based preferences under the guidance of an informative Beta prior. This approach enables direct optimization of the diffusion policy without specifying any reward functions, while effectively mitigating the influence of inconsistent preferences across different user groups. We conduct extensive experiments across both simulated and real-world robotics tasks, and diverse human preference configurations, demonstrating the robustness and reliability of Diff-UAPA in achieving effective preference alignment. The project page is available at https://github.com/mr20010112/Diff_UAPA.
Runqing Miao, Runyi Zhao, Wai Kin Chan, Guiliang Liu
NeurIPS1