Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sheng-Ping Lan
dblp:341/9659
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › modulation › amplitude-phase modulation
amplitude phase shift keying |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Two Efficient Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithms for APSK Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Physical-layer communications › channel estimation
blind estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Two Efficient Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithms for APSK Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Physical-layer communications › synchronization › frequency synchronization
carrier frequency offset estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Two Efficient Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithms for APSK Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Physical-layer communications
modulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Two Efficient Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithms for APSK Signals · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parabolic interpolation · 0.8modulation removal · 0.8FFT-based estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Two Efficient Blind Carrier Frequency Offset Estimation Algorithms for APSK SignalsabstractThis paper presents two methods for blind carrier frequency offset (CFO) estimation for amplitude phase shift keying (APSK) signals. The first approach carries out modulation removal using the outermost symbols of APSK and then utilizes an iterative parabolic interpolation technique to mitigate the bias of FFT-based CFO estimation. The second method conducts two-stage full modulation removal and aggregates symbols to reduce the FFT size for CFO estimation. In the symbol aggregation process, modulation-removed symbols are paired and weighted based on their reliability to achieve accurate estimation. The first method demonstrates better performance, particularly for high-precision requirements, while the second method offers a more adaptable trade-off between performance and complexity by adjusting the aggregation length. Both methods are more efficient and provide better mean square error (MSE) performance compared to existing ones. Moreover, numerical complexity analyses show the efficiency of the proposed algorithms. Sheng-Ping Lan, Huang-Chang Lee, Hua-Lung Tsai, Yeong-Luh Ueng |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |