Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rasmus Rudling

dblp:341/9830 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5600-6864ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › aerial robot interaction
human-drone interaction
0.712023
Increasing Perceived Safety in Motion Planning for Human-Drone Interaction · HRI 2023
Human-robot interaction › safe human-robot interaction
perceived safety
0.712023
Increasing Perceived Safety in Motion Planning for Human-Drone Interaction · HRI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.7control barrier functions · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Increasing Perceived Safety in Motion Planning for Human-Drone Interaction
abstract
Safety is crucial for autonomous drones to operate close to humans. Besides avoiding unwanted or harmful contact, people should also perceive the drone as safe. Existing safe motion planning approaches for autonomous robots, such as drones, have primarily focused on ensuring physical safety, e.g., by imposing constraints on motion planners. However, studies indicate that ensuring physical safety does not necessarily lead to perceived safety. Prior work in Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) shows that factors such as the drone's speed and distance to the human are important for perceived safety. Building on these works, we propose a parameterized control barrier function (CBF) that constrains the drone's maximum deceleration and minimum distance to the human and update its parameters on people's ratings of perceived safety. We describe an implementation and evaluation of our approach. Results of a within-subject user study (N=15) show that we can improve perceived safety of a drone by adjusting to people individually.
Sanne van Waveren, Rasmus Rudling, Iolanda Leite, Patric Jensfelt, Christian Pek
HRI2