Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sicong Shen

dblp:342/1091 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 67% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.812024
Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.812024
Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
structural risk minimization
0.812024
Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stable rank shrinkage · 0.8regularization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning
abstract
Existing finetuning methods for computer vision tasks primarily focus on re-weighting the knowledge learned from the source domain during pre-training. They aim to retain beneficial knowledge for the target domain while suppressing unfavorable knowledge. During the pre-training and fine-tuning stages, there is a notable disparity in the data scale. Consequently, it is theoretically necessary to employ a model with reduced complexity to mitigate the potential structural risk. However, our empirical investigation in this paper reveals that models finetuned using existing methods still manifest a high level of model complexity inherited from the pre-training stage, leading to a suboptimal stability and generalization ability. This phenomenon indicates an issue that has been overlooked in fine-tuning: Structural Risk Minimization. To address this issue caused by data scale disparity during the fine-tuning stage, we propose a simple yet effective approach called Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage (TSRS). TSRS mitigates the structural risk during the fine-tuning stage by constraining the noise sensitivity of the target model based on stable rank theories. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that incorporating TSRS into fine-tuning methods leads to improved generalization ability on various tasks, regardless of whether the neural networks are based on convolution or transformer architectures. Additionally, empirical analysis reveals that TSRS enhances the robustness, convexity, and smoothness of the loss landscapes in fine-tuned models. Code is available at https://github.com/WitGotFlg/TSRS.
Sicong Shen, Yang Zhou 0036, Bingzheng Wei, Eric I-Chao Chang, Yan Xu 0001
CVPR1