Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sicong Shen
dblp:342/1091
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 67% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
structural risk minimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuning · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stable rank shrinkage · 0.8regularization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage: Aiming at the Overlooked Structural Risk in Fine-tuningabstractExisting finetuning methods for computer vision tasks primarily focus on re-weighting the knowledge learned from the source domain during pre-training. They aim to retain beneficial knowledge for the target domain while suppressing unfavorable knowledge. During the pre-training and fine-tuning stages, there is a notable disparity in the data scale. Consequently, it is theoretically necessary to employ a model with reduced complexity to mitigate the potential structural risk. However, our empirical investigation in this paper reveals that models finetuned using existing methods still manifest a high level of model complexity inherited from the pre-training stage, leading to a suboptimal stability and generalization ability. This phenomenon indicates an issue that has been overlooked in fine-tuning: Structural Risk Minimization. To address this issue caused by data scale disparity during the fine-tuning stage, we propose a simple yet effective approach called Tuning Stable Rank Shrinkage (TSRS). TSRS mitigates the structural risk during the fine-tuning stage by constraining the noise sensitivity of the target model based on stable rank theories. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that incorporating TSRS into fine-tuning methods leads to improved generalization ability on various tasks, regardless of whether the neural networks are based on convolution or transformer architectures. Additionally, empirical analysis reveals that TSRS enhances the robustness, convexity, and smoothness of the loss landscapes in fine-tuned models. Code is available at https://github.com/WitGotFlg/TSRS. Sicong Shen, Yang Zhou 0036, Bingzheng Wei, Eric I-Chao Chang, Yan Xu 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |