Our team developed a riding ballbot (called PURE) that is dynamically stable, omnidirectional, and driven by lean-to-steer control. A hands-free admittance control scheme (HACS) was previously integrated to allow riders with different torso functions to control the robot's movements via torso leaning and twisting. Such an interface requires motor coordination skills and could result in collisions with obstacles due to low proficiency. Hence, a shared controller (SC) that limits the speed of PURE could be helpful to ensure the safety of riders. However, the self-balancing dynamics of PURE could result in a weak control authority of its motion, in which the torso motion of the rider could easily disturb the tracking of the command speed dictated by the shared controller. Thus, we proposed an interactive hands-free admittance control scheme (iHACS), with the following features to improve the speed-tracking performance of PURE: control gain personalization module and interaction compensation module. Human riding tests of simple tasks, idle-keeping and speed-limiting, were conducted to compare the performance of HACS and iHACS. Two manual wheelchair users and two able-bodied individuals participated in this study. They were instructed to use “adver-sarial” torso motions that would tax the PURE's ability to keep the ballbot idling or below a set speed, i.e., competing objectives between rider and robot. In the idle-keeping tasks, iHACS demonstrated minimal translational motion and low command speed tracking RMSE, even with significant torso lean angles. During the speed-limiting task, where the commanded speed was saturated at 0.5 m/s, the system achieved an average maximum speed of 1.1 m/s with iHACS, compared with that of over 1.9 m/s with HACS. These results suggest that iHACS can enhance PURE's control authority over the rider, which enables PURE to provide physical interactions back to the rider and results in a collaborative rider-robot synergy.

A novel wheelchair called PURE (Personalized Unique Rolling Experience) that uses hands-free (HF) torso lean-to-steer control has been developed for manual wheelchair users (mWCUs). PURE addresses limitations of current wheelchairs, such as the inability to use both hands for life experiences instead of propulsion. PURE uses a ball-based robot drivetrain to offer a compact, self-balancing, omnidirectional mobile device. A custom sensor system converts rider torso motions into direction and speed commands to control PURE, which is especially useful if a rider has minimal torso range of motion. We explored whether PURE's HF control performed as well as a traditional joystick (JS) human-robot interface and mWCUs, who may have reduced torso motion, performed as well as able-bodied users (ABUs). 10 mWCUs and 10 ABUs were trained and tested to drive PURE through courses replicating indoor environments. Each participant adjusted personal sensitivity settings for both HF and JS control. Repeated-measures MANOVA tests suggested that the effectiveness (number of collisions), efficiency (completion time), comfort (NASA TLX scores except physical demand), and robustness (index of performances) were similar for HF and JS control and between mWCUs and ABUs for all sections. These results suggest that PURE provides an effective method for controlling this new omnidirectional wheelchair by only using torso motion thus leaving both hands to be used for other tasks during propulsion.

We designed and validated two interfaces for physical human-robot interaction that utilize torso motions for hands-free navigation control of riding or remote mobile robots. The Torso-dynamics Estimation System (TES), which consisted of an instrumented seat (Force Sensing Seat, FSS) and a wearable sensor (inertial measurement unit, IMU), was developed to quantify the translational and rotational motions of the torso, respectively. The FSS was constructed from six uniaxial loadcells to output 3D resultant forces and torques, which were used to compute the translational movement of the 2D center of pressure (COP) under the seated user. Two versions of the FSS (Gen 1.0 and 2.0) with different loadcell layouts, materials, and manufacturing methods were developed to showcase the versatility of the FSS design and construction. Both FSS versions utilized low-cost components and a simple calibration protocol to correct for dimensional inaccuracies. The IMU, attached on the user’s upper chest, used a proprietary algorithm to compute the 3D torso angles without relying heavily on magnetometers to minimize errors from electromagnetic noises. A validation study was performed on eight test subjects (six able-bodied users and two manual wheelchair users with reduced torso range of motion) to validate TES estimations by comparing them to data collected on a research-grade force plate and motion capture system. TES readings displayed high accuracy (average RMSE of 3D forces, 3D torques, 2D COP, and torso angles were well less than maximum limits of 5N, 5Nm, 10mm, and 6°, respectively).

A hands-free (HF) lean-to-steer control concept that uses torso motions is demonstrated by navigating a virtual robotic mobility device based on a ball-based robotic (ballbot) wheelchair. A custom sensor system (i.e., Torso-dynamics Estimation System (TES)) was utilized to measure and convert the dynamics of the rider’s torso motions into commands to provide HF control of the robot. A simulation study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the HF controller compared to a traditional joystick (JS) controller, and whether there were differences in performance by manual wheelchair users (mWCUs), who may have reduced torso function, compared to able-bodied users (ABUs). Twenty test subjects (10 mWCUs +10 ABUs) used the subject-specific adjusted TES while wearing a virtual reality headset and were asked to navigate a virtual human rider on the ballbot through obstacle courses replicating seven indoor environment zones. Repeated measures MANOVA tests assessed performance metrics representing efficiency (i.e., number of collisions), effectiveness (i.e., completion time), comfort (i.e., NASA TLX scores), and robustness (i.e., index of performance). As expected, more challenging zones took longer to complete and resulted in more collisions. An interaction effect was observed such that ABUs had significantly more collisions using JS vs. HF control, while mWCUs had little difference with either interface. All subjects reported greater physical demand was needed for HF control than JS control; although, no users visibly showed or expressed fatigue or exhaustion when using HF control. In general, HF control performed as well as JS control, and mWC’s performed similarly to ABUs.