EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elaine Hu
dblp:342/2631
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network performance modeling · 77% Internet architecture and protocols · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network performance modeling
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: An Open-Source Evaluation Framework for Time-Sensitive Networking Scheduling Research · RTSS 2025 |
Internet architecture and protocols
time-sensitive networking |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: An Open-Source Evaluation Framework for Time-Sensitive Networking Scheduling Research · RTSS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation-based validation · 1.7benchmarking · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Work-in-Progress: An Open-Source Evaluation Framework for Time-Sensitive Networking Scheduling ResearchabstractReproducing and extending research on TimeSensitive Networking (TSN) scheduling has become increasingly challenging, as most published methods lack open-source implementations. The few available implementations are often scattered across different programming languages and formats, forcing researchers to reimplement algorithms from scratch—a time-consuming and error-prone process that hinders fair comparison of methods and slows research progress. In this work, we present TSNKit, an open-source toolkit designed to address these challenges through: (i) standardized implementations of a broad set of representative scheduling algorithms with unified interfaces for integrating new methods; (ii) an end-to-end pipeline covering test case generation, scheduling, and simulation-based validation; and (iii) comprehensive benchmarking modules for reproducible performance evaluation. TSNKit enables researchers to reproduce published results, extend existing methods, and perform fair comparisons across algorithms. Our ongoing work extends TSNKit to support multiple traffic shapers beyond Time-Aware Shaping (TAS), improve benchmark efficiency through enhanced scheduling heuristics, and incorporate hardware-in-the-loop capabilities for seamless real-world deployment. Chuanyu Xue, Elaine Hu, Tianyu Zhang 0001, Song Han 0002 |
RTSS | 2 |