Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Srinidhi Nagendra

dblp:342/2893 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7171-5543ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 74% Electronic design automation · 26%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
consensus
0.912025
Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-guided fuzzing
0.912025
Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Distributed systems
distributed system testing
0.912025
Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software testing › fuzzing
coverage-guided fuzzing
0.812024
Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Software testing
random testing
0.812024
Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.812024
Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
TLA+
0.312025
Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random test generation · 1.7coverage-guided fuzzing · 1.7reward shaping · 1.5reinforcement learning · 1.5exploration bonus · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LLM-Assisted Analysis of On-Chip Protocol Implementations
Melisande Zonta-Roudes, Nora Hinderling, Supraja Sridhara, Srinidhi Nagendra, Shweta Shinde
FCCM4
2025 Optimal Concolic Dynamic Partial Order Reduction
abstract
Stateless model checking (SMC) software implementations requires exploring both concurrency- and data nondeterminism. Unfortunately, most SMC algorithms focus on efficient exploration of concurrency nondeterminism, thereby neglecting an important source of bugs. We present ConDpor, an SMC algorithm for unmodified Java programs that combines optimal dynamic partial order reduction (DPOR) for concurrency nondeterminism, with concolic execution for data nondeterminism. ConDpor is sound, complete, optimal, and parametric w.r.t. the memory consistency model. Our experiments confirm that ConDpor is exponentially faster than DPOR with small-domain enumeration. Overall, ConDpor opens the door for efficient exploration of concurrent programs with data nondeterminism.
Mohammad Hossein Khoshechin Jorshari, Michalis Kokologiannakis, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra
CONCUR4
2025 Model-Guided Fuzzing of Distributed Systems
abstract
We present a coverage-guided testing algorithm for distributed systems implementations. Our main innovation is the use of an abstract formal model of the system that is used to define coverage. Such abstract models are frequently developed in the early phases of protocol design and verification but are infrequently used at testing time. We show that guiding random test generation using model coverage can be effective in covering interesting points in the implementation state space. We have implemented a fuzzer for distributed system implementations and abstract models written in TLA+. Our algorithm achieves better coverage over purely random exploration as well as random exploration guided by different notions of scheduler coverage and mutation. In particular, we show consistently higher coverage on implementations of distributed consensus protocols such as Two-Phase Commit and the Raft implementations in Etcd-raft and RedisRaft and detect bugs faster. Moreover, we discovered 12 previously unknown bugs in their implementations, four of which could only be detected by model-guided fuzzing.
Ege Berkay Gulcan, Burcu Kulahcioglu Ozkan, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.4
2024 Reward Augmentation in Reinforcement Learning for Testing Distributed Systems
abstract
Bugs in popular distributed protocol implementations have been the source of many downtimes in popular internet services. We describe a randomized testing approach for distributed protocol implementations based on reinforcement learning. Since the natural reward structure is very sparse, the key to successful exploration in reinforcement learning is reward augmentation. We show two different techniques that build on one another. First, we provide a decaying exploration bonus based on the discovery of new states—the reward decays as the same state is visited multiple times. The exploration bonus captures the intuition from coverage-guided fuzzing of prioritizing new coverage points; in contrast to other schemes, we show that taking the maximum of the bonus and the Q-value leads to more effective exploration. Second, we provide waypoints to the algorithm as a sequence of predicates that capture interesting semantic scenarios. Waypoints exploit designer insight about the protocol and guide the exploration to “interesting” parts of the state space. Our reward structure ensures that new episodes can reliably get to deep interesting states even without execution caching. We have implemented our algorithm in Go. Our evaluation on three large benchmarks (RedisRaft, Etcd, and RSL) shows that our algorithm can significantly outperform baseline approaches in terms of coverage and bug finding.
Andrea Borgarelli, Constantin Enea, Rupak Majumdar, Srinidhi Nagendra
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.4