Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dana Azouri
dblp:342/4517
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A LASSO-based approach to sample sites for phylogenetic tree search · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
phylogenetic tree search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A LASSO-based approach to sample sites for phylogenetic tree search · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularized regression · 0.6LASSO regression · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A LASSO-based approach to sample sites for phylogenetic tree searchabstractMOTIVATION: In recent years, full-genome sequences have become increasingly available and as a result many modern phylogenetic analyses are based on very long sequences, often with over 100 000 sites. Phylogenetic reconstructions of large-scale alignments are challenging for likelihood-based phylogenetic inference programs and usually require using a powerful computer cluster. Current tools for alignment trimming prior to phylogenetic analysis do not promise a significant reduction in the alignment size and are claimed to have a negative effect on the accuracy of the obtained tree. RESULTS: Here, we propose an artificial-intelligence-based approach, which provides means to select the optimal subset of sites and a formula by which one can compute the log-likelihood of the entire data based on this subset. Our approach is based on training a regularized Lasso-regression model that optimizes the log-likelihood prediction accuracy while putting a constraint on the number of sites used for the approximation. We show that computing the likelihood based on 5% of the sites already provides accurate approximation of the tree likelihood based on the entire data. Furthermore, we show that using this Lasso-based approximation during a tree search decreased running-time substantially while retaining the same tree-search performance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code was implemented in Python version 3.8 and is available through GitHub (https://github.com/noaeker/lasso_positions_sampling). The datasets used in this paper were retrieved from Zhou et al. (2018) as described in section 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Noa Ecker, Dana Azouri, Ben Bettisworth, Alexandros Stamatakis, Yishay Mansour, Itay Mayrose, Tal Pupko |
Bioinform. | 2 |