Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Bognár

dblp:342/4870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
feature visualization
0.812024
Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature Visualization · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature Visualization · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.212024
Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature Visualization · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural response modeling
0.212024
Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature Visualization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

latent activation analysis · 1.5deep neural network · 1.5backpropagation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Parallel Backpropagation for Shared-Feature Visualization
abstract
High-level visual brain regions contain subareas in which neurons appear to respond more strongly to examples of a particular semantic category, like faces or bodies, rather than objects. However, recent work has shown that while this finding holds on average, some out-of-category stimuli also activate neurons in these regions. This may be due to visual features common among the preferred class also being present in other images. Here, we propose a deep-learning-based approach for visualizing these features. For each neuron, we identify relevant visual features driving its selectivity by modelling responses to images based on latent activations of a deep neural network. Given an out-of-category image which strongly activates the neuron, our method first identifies a reference image from the preferred category yielding a similar feature activation pattern. We then backpropagate latent activations of both images to the pixel level, while enhancing the identified shared dimensions and attenuating non-shared features. The procedure highlights image regions containing shared features driving responses of the model neuron. We apply the algorithm to novel recordings from body-selective regions in macaque IT cortex in order to understand why some images of objects excite these neurons. Visualizations reveal object parts which resemble parts of a macaque body, shedding light on neural preference of these objects.
Alexander Lappe, Anna Bognár, Ghazaleh Ghamkhari Nejad, Albert Mukovskiy, Lucas Martini, Martin A. Giese, Rufin Vogels
NeurIPS2
2023 Neurodynamical Model of the Visual Recognition of Dynamic Bodily Actions from Silhouettes
Prerana Kumar, Nick Taubert, Rajani Raman, Anna Bognár, Ghazaleh Ghamkhari Nejad, Rufin Vogels, Martin A. Giese
ICANN (2)4