Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chunlin Li 0007

dblp:342/5149-7 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2989-8785ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 80% Learning theory · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.712023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
directed acyclic graph
0.712023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.712023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
likelihood ratio test
0.712023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.712023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference
0.212023
Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

peeling algorithm · 1.3nodewise regression · 1.3data perturbation · 1.3ranking-based framework · 0.7plug-in rule · 0.7GPU parallel execution · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Inference for a Large Directed Acyclic Graph with Unspecified Interventions
abstract
Statistical inference of directed relations given some unspecified interventions (i.e., the intervention targets are unknown) is challenging. In this article, we test hypothesized directed relations with unspecified interventions. First, we derive conditions to yield an identifiable model. Unlike classical inference, testing directed relations requires identifying the ancestors and relevant interventions of hypothesis-specific primary variables. To this end, we propose a peeling algorithm based on nodewise regressions to establish a topological order of primary variables. Moreover, we prove that the peeling algorithm yields a consistent estimator in low-order polynomial time. Second, we propose a likelihood ratio test integrated with a data perturbation scheme to account for the uncertainty of identifying ancestors and interventions. Also, we show that the distribution of a data perturbation test statistic converges to the target distribution. Numerical examples demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of the proposed methods, including an application to infer gene regulatory networks.
Chunlin Li 0007, Xiaotong Shen, Wei Pan 0011
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2023 RankSEG: A Consistent Ranking-based Framework for Segmentation
abstract
Segmentation has emerged as a fundamental field of computer vision and natural language processing, which assigns a label to every pixel/feature to extract regions of interest from an image/text. To evaluate the performance of segmentation, the Dice and IoU metrics are used to measure the degree of overlap between the ground truth and the predicted segmentation. In this paper, we establish a theoretical foundation of segmentation with respect to the Dice/IoU metrics, including the Bayes rule and Dice-/IoU-calibration, analogous to classification-calibration or Fisher consistency in classification. We prove that the existing thresholding-based framework with most operating losses are not consistent with respect to the Dice/IoU metrics, and thus may lead to a suboptimal solution. To address this pitfall, we propose a novel consistent ranking-based framework, namely RankDice/RankIoU, inspired by plug-in rules of the Bayes segmentation rule. Three numerical algorithms with GPU parallel execution are developed to implement the proposed framework in large-scale and high-dimensional segmentation. We study statistical properties of the proposed framework. We show it is Dice-/IoU-calibrated, and its excess risk bounds and the rate of convergence are also provided. The numerical effectiveness of RankDice/mRankDice is demonstrated in various simulated examples and Fine-annotated CityScapes, Pascal VOC and Kvasir-SEG datasets with state-of-the-art deep learning architectures. Python module and source code are available on Github at (https://github.com/statmlben/rankseg).
Ben Dai, Chunlin Li 0007
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2