We introduce River, a novel Condorcet-consistent voting method that is based on pairwise majority margins and can be seen as a simplified variation of Tideman's Ranked Pairs method. River is simple to explain, simple to compute even "by hand," and gives rise to an easy-to-interpret certificate in the form of a directed tree. Like Ranked Pairs and Schulze's Beat Path method, River is a refinement of the Split Cycle method and shares with those many desirable properties, including independence of clones. Unlike the other three methods, River satisfies a strong form of resistance to agenda-manipulation that is known as independence of Pareto-dominated alternatives.

Recently, the River Method was introduced as novel refinement of the Split Cycle voting rule. The decision-making process of River is closely related to the well established Ranked Pairs Method. Both methods consider a margin graph computed from the voters' preferences and eliminate majority cycles in that graph to choose a winner. As ties can occur in the margin graph, a tiebreaker is required along with the preferences. While such a tiebreaker makes the computation efficient, it compromises the fundamental property of neutrality: the voting rule should not favor alternatives in advance. One way to reintroduce neutrality is to use Parallel-Universe Tiebreaking (PUT), where each alternative is a winner if it wins according to any possible tiebreaker. Unfortunately, computing the winners selected by Ranked Pairs with PUT is NP-complete. Given the similarity of River to Ranked Pairs, one might expect River to suffer from the same complexity. Surprisingly, we show the opposite: We present a polynomial-time algorithm for computing River winners with PUT, highlighting significant structural advantages of River over Ranked Pairs. Our Fused-Universe (FUN) algorithm simulates River for every possible tiebreaking in one pass. From the resulting FUN diagram one can then directly read off both the set of winners and, for each winner, a certificate that explains how this alternative dominates the others.

We examine the problem of maximizing the reachability of a given source in temporal graphs that are given as the union of k temporal paths, i.e., every given path is a sequence of edges with strictly increasing labels that denote availability in time. This type of temporal graphs represent train networks. We consider shifting operations on the labels of the paths that maintain their temporal continuity. This means that we can move the availability of a temporal edge later or earlier in time, and propagate the shifts to all other affected edges of the path in order to preserve its temporal connectivity. We study the parameterized complexity of the problem with respect to the number of paths k, and the total budget b, where b is the maximum number of shifts we are allowed to perform. Our results reveal that fixed parameter tractability can be achieved (1) when parameterized both by k and b, and (2) when parameterized by k, and b is unlimited. In almost every other case, e.g., parameterized by a single parameter or parameterized by k, while having a bound on b, we establish intractability lower bounds that are matched by XP algorithms.

Logistics and transportation networks require a large amount of resources to realise necessary connections between locations and minimizing these resources is a vital aspect of planning research. Since such networks have dynamic connections that are only available at specific times, intricate models are needed to portray them accurately. In this paper, we study the problem of minimizing the number of resources needed to realise a dynamic network, using the temporal graphs model. In a temporal graph, edges appear at specific points in time. Given a temporal graph and a natural number k, we ask whether we can cover every temporal edge exactly once using at most k temporal journeys; in a temporal journey consecutive edges have to adhere to the order of time. We conduct a thorough investigation of the complexity of the problem with respect to four dimensions: (a) whether the type of the temporal journey is a walk, a trail, or a path; (b) whether the chronological order of edges in the journey is strict or non-strict; (c) whether the temporal graph is directed or undirected; (d) whether the start and end points of each journey are given. We almost completely resolve the complexity of these problems and provide dichotomies for each of them with respect to k.

Researchers, policy makers, and engineers need to make sense of data from spreading processes as diverse as rumor spreading in social networks, viral infections, and water contamination. Classical questions include predicting infection behavior in a given network or deducing the network structure from infection data. Most of the research on network infections studies static graphs, that is, the connections in the network are assumed to not change. More recently, temporal graphs, in which connections change over time, have been used to more accurately represent real-world infections, which rarely occur in unchanging networks. We propose a model for temporal graph discovery that is consistent with previous work on static graphs and embraces the greater expressiveness of temporal graphs. For this model, we give algorithms and lower bounds which are often tight. We analyze different variations of the problem, which make our results widely applicable and it also clarifies which aspects of temporal infections make graph discovery easier or harder. We round off our analysis with an experimental evaluation of our algorithm on real-world interaction data from the Stanford Network Analysis Project and on temporal Erdős-Renyi graphs. On Erdős-Renyi graphs, we uncover a threshold behavior, which can be explained by a novel connectivity parameter that we introduce during our theoretical analysis.

Given an undirected graph G, the problem of deciding whether G admits a simple and proper time-labeling that makes it temporally connected is known to be NP-hard (Göbel et al., 1991). In this article, we relax this problem and ask whether a given degree sequence can be realized as a temporally connected graph. Our main results are a complete characterization of the feasible cases, and a recognition algorithm that runs in 𝒪(n) time for graphical degree sequences (realized as simple temporal graphs) and in 𝒪(n+m) time for multigraphical degree sequences (realized as non-simple temporal graphs, where the number of time labels on an edge corresponds to the multiplicity of the edge in the multigraph). In fact, these algorithms can be made constructive at essentially no cost. Namely, we give a constructive 𝒪(n+m) time algorithm that outputs, for a given (multi)graphical degree sequence 𝐝, a temporally connected graph whose underlying (multi)graph is a realization of 𝐝, if one exists.

Temporal graphs model networks whose connections are available only at specific points in time. Several definitional subtleties - whether paths must follow strictly increasing time labels (strict vs. non-strict), whether adjacent edges cannot appear simultaneously (proper), and whether edges are forbidden to appear multiple times (simple) - give rise to different temporal graph settings. These distinctions directly impact the definition of temporal reachability, a core concept in temporal graph theory. Casteigts, Corsini, and Sarkar [TCS24] introduced a framework of equivalence notions to compare the expressive power of these settings focusing solely on undirected temporal graphs. In this work, we extend their framework to include the fundamental dimension of directed vs. undirected. Our contribution is three-fold. We (1) complete the undirected hierarchy by resolving the two open questions from [TCS24], (2) fully characterize the hierarchy of the directed settings, and (3) compare the directed and undirected settings, showing that directed temporal graphs are strictly more expressive than undirected temporal graphs in terms of reachability. Our structural results highlight both the limitations and strengths of various temporal graph settings - for example, directed + strict + simple graphs can realize every possible reachability graph, while directed + proper graphs necessarily induce at least one transitive reachability on each directed cycle. We also provide transformation procedures between temporal settings offering practical tools for transferring algorithms and hardness results across models.

The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is a popular generalization of the Traveling Salesperson Problem. Instead of one salesperson traversing the entire weighted, undirected graph G, there are k vehicles available to jointly cover the set of clients C ⊆ V(G). Every vehicle must start at one of the depot vertices D ⊆ V(G) and return to its start. Capacitated Vehicle Routing (CVRP) additionally restricts the route of each vehicle by limiting the number of clients it can cover, the distance it can travel, or both. In this work, we study the complexity of VRP and the three variants of CVRP for several parameterizations, in particular focusing on the treewidth of G. We present an FPT algorithm for VRP parameterized by treewidth. For CVRP, we prove paraNP- and W[⋅]-hardness for various parameterizations, including treewidth, thereby rendering the existence of FPT algorithms unlikely. In turn, we provide an XP algorithm for CVRP when parameterized by both treewidth and the vehicle capacity.

In most major cities and urban areas, residents form homogeneous neighborhoods along ethnic or socioeconomic lines. This phenomenon is widely known as residential segregation and has been studied extensively. Fifty years ago, Schelling proposed a landmark model that explains residential segregation in an elegant agent-based way. A recent stream of papers analyzed Schelling's model using game-theoretic approaches. However, all these works considered models with a given number of discrete types modeling different ethnic groups. We focus on segregation caused by non-categorical attributes, such as household income or position in a political left-right spectrum. For this, we consider agent types that can be represented as real numbers. This opens up a great variety of reasonable models and, as a proof of concept, we focus on several natural candidates. In particular, we consider agents that evaluate their location by the average type-difference or the maximum type-difference to their neighbors, or by having a certain tolerance range for type-values of neighboring agents.We study the existence and computation of equilibria and provide bounds on the Price of Anarchy and Stability. Also, we present simulation results that compare our models and shed light on the obtained equilibria for our variants.