Machine learning (ML) models in production fail when their broader systems – from data pipelines to deployment environments – deviate from training assumptions, not merely due to statistical anomalies in input data. Despite extensive work on data drift, data validation, and out-of-distribution detection, ML monitoring research remains largely model-centric while neglectingcontextual information: auxiliary signals about the system around the model (external factors, data pipelines, downstream applications). Incorporating this context turns statistical anomalies into actionable alerts and structured root-cause analysis. Drawing on a systematic review of 94 primary studies, we identify three dimensions of contextual information for ML monitoring: thesystemelement concerned (natural environment or technical infrastructure); theaspectof that element (runtime states, structural relationships, prescriptive properties); and therepresentationused (formal constructs or informal formats). This forms theContextual System-Aspect-Representation(C-SAR) framework, a descriptive model synthesizing our findings. We identify 20 recurring triplets across these dimensions and map them to the monitoring activities they support. This study provides a holistic perspective on ML monitoring: from interpreting “tea leaves” (i.e., isolated data and performance statistics) to constructing and managing “system maps” (i.e., end-to-end views that connect data, models, and operating context).