Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Bouchaud

dblp:344/2366 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0310-8194ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › platform governance
content moderation
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
platform governance
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Web and mobile security
online advertising
0.812024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024
Privacy and data protection
regulatory compliance
0.212024
Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical estimation · 1.5dataset analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Browsing Amazon's Book Bubbles
Paul Bouchaud
ASONAM (2)1
2024 A Dataset to Assess Microsoft Copilot Answers in the Context of Swiss, Bavarian and Hessian Elections
abstract
This study describes a dataset that allows to assess the emerging challenges posed by Generative Artificial Intelligence when doing Active Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), especially when summarizing trustworthy sources on the Internet. As a case study, we focus on Microsoft Copilot, an innovative software that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) and Search Engines (SE) making advanced AI accessible to the general public. The core contribution of this paper is the presentation of the largest public database to date of RAG responses to user prompts, collected during the 2023 electoral campaigns in Switzerland, Bavaria and Hesse. This dataset was compiled with the assistance of a group of experts who posed realistic voter questions and conducted fact-checking of Microsoft Copilot's responses. It contains prompts and answers in English, German, French and Italian. All the collection happened during the electoral campaign, between 21 August 2023 and 2 October 2023. The paper makes available the full set of 5,561 pairs of prompts and answers, including the URLs referenced in the answers. In addition to the dataset itself, we provide 1374 answers labelled by a group of experts who rated the accuracy of the answers in providing factual information, showing that almost one out of three times the chatbot responded with either factually incorrect information or completely nonsensical answers. This resource is intended to facilitate further research into the performance of LLMs in the context of elections, defined as a "high-risk scenario" by the Digital Services Act (DSA) Article 34(1)(c).
Salvatore Romano, Riccardo Angius, Natalie Kerby, Paul Bouchaud, Jacopo Amidei, Andreas Kaltenbrunner
ICWSM4
2024 Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU
abstract
This study examines Meta's enforcement of its political advertising policies across 16 European Union countries. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset provided by Meta under the European Digital Services Act, encompassing all ads targeting EU countries, our analysis exposes shortcomings in Meta's ad moderation. In particular, over 60% of the ads moderated as political by Meta do not fall under Meta's guidelines. Also, we estimate that only 7.7% of undeclared political ads, i.e., political ads that are not declared as such by advertisers, undergo moderation by Meta. These results highlight substantial deficiencies in Meta's regulation of political advertisements, underscoring the need for enhanced measures to safeguard democratic discourse.
Paul Bouchaud, Jean F. Liénard
IMC1