Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Smith Sundarsingh

dblp:344/4027 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-9200-7893ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 25% Reinforcement learning · 25% Motion planning and robot control · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance
0.812024
Safe Multi-Robot Exploration using Symbolic Control · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination
0.812024
Safe Multi-Robot Exploration using Symbolic Control · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
multi-robot exploration
0.812024
Safe Multi-Robot Exploration using Symbolic Control · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation
safe navigation
0.812024
Safe Multi-Robot Exploration using Symbolic Control · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic control · 0.8distance function · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Safe Multi-Robot Exploration using Symbolic Control
abstract
Multi-robot exploration is a complex problem that involves multiple robots working in a shared unknown environment. In such scenarios, the safety of the robots is of paramount importance alongside the completion of the exploration task. In this paper, we propose a modular exploration framework that (i) identifies safe frontier targets for multiple robots while taking into account the system dynamics of each robot to ensure collision avoidance with previously unknown obstacles and (ii) ensures that the robots reach their exploration targets while avoiding any obstacles discovered and each other. We employ a scalable approach to generate symbolic controllers for the multi-robot system, utilizing distance functions. We also provide formal guarantees on the safety of the exploration targets and the completion of each exploration run, with the robots avoiding collisions with each other and the obstacles. We test our approach on simulation experiments and a real-world implementation to validate it.
Manas Sashank Juvvi, David Smith Sundarsingh, Ratnangshu Das, Pushpak Jagtap
ICRA2
2023 Autonomous Exploration Using Ground Robots with Safety Guarantees
abstract
Autonomous exploration in an unknown environment is widely studied, and many exploration strategies exist. However, in most of the works, safety is not usually given top priority. The reason behind the violation of safety by most of the exploration algorithms in real-world applications is the ignorance of some or all of the following factors (i) the mathematical model of the robot, (ii) practical constraints on states (like constrained steering angle, speed, etc.) and inputs (like actuator saturation), and (iii) hardware constraints such as sampling time, sensor noise, modelling uncertainties, etc. In this work, we propose an autonomous exploration framework for the 2-D exploration problem that considers the factors above to provide safety guarantees for the robot and the environment. The effectiveness of this method is shown in a high-fidelity simulation of different robots with onboard sensors in different simulation environments and real-world implementation.
David Smith Sundarsingh, Jay Bhagiya, Jeel Chatrola, Pushpak Jagtap
IROS1