Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patricia Guerra-Balboa

dblp:344/4169 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3035-8230ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.922026
Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Balancing Privacy and Utility in Correlated Data: A Study of Bayesian Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Privacy and data protection › statistical database privacy
disclosure risk
1.012026
Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › noise addition
noise calibration
1.012026
Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing
1.012026
Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
bayesian differential privacy
0.912025
Balancing Privacy and Utility in Correlated Data: A Study of Bayesian Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private query answering › private data analysis
correlated data privacy
0.912025
Balancing Privacy and Utility in Correlated Data: A Study of Bayesian Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.912025
Balancing Privacy and Utility in Correlated Data: A Study of Bayesian Differential Privacy · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov chain modeling · 0.9gaussian multivariate distribution · 0.9bayesian inference · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Understanding Disclosure Risk in Differential Privacy with Applications to Noise Calibration and Auditing
Patricia Guerra-Balboa, Annika Sauer, Héber Hwang Arcolezi, Thorsten Strufe
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2025 Balancing Privacy and Utility in Correlated Data: A Study of Bayesian Differential Privacy
abstract
Privacy risks in differentially private (DP) systems increase significantly when data is correlated, as standard DP metrics often underestimate the resulting privacy leakage, leaving sensitive information vulnerable. Given the ubiquity of dependencies in real-world databases, this oversight poses a critical challenge for privacy protections. Bayesian differential privacy (BDP) extends DP to account for these correlations, yet current BDP mechanisms indicate a notable utility loss, limiting its adoption. In this work, we address whether BDP can be realistically implemented in common data structures without sacrificing utility—a key factor for its applicability. By analyzing arbitrary and structured correlation models, including Gaussian multivariate distributions and Markov chains, we derive practical utility guarantees for BDP. Our contributions include theoretical links between DP and BDP and a novel methodology to adapt DP mechanisms to meet the requirements of BDP. Through evaluations on real-world databases, we demonstrate that our novel theorems enable the design of BDP mechanisms that maintain competitive utility, paving the way for practical privacy-preserving data practices in correlated settings.
Martin Lange 0002, Patricia Guerra-Balboa, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten Strufe
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2024 Composition in Differential Privacy for General Granularity Notions
abstract
The composition theorems of differential privacy (DP) allow data curators to combine different algorithms to obtain a new algorithm that continues to satisfy DP. However, new granularity notions (i.e., neigh-borhood definitions), data domains, and composition settings have appeared in the literature that the classical composition theorems do not cover. For instance, the original parallel composition theorem does not translate well to general granularity notions. This complicates the opportunity of composing DP mechanisms in new settings and obtaining accurate estimates of the incurred privacy loss after composition. To overcome these limitations, we study the composability of DP in a general framework and for any kind of data domain or neighborhood definition. We give a general composition theorem in both independent and adaptive versions and we provide analogous composition results for approximate, zero-concentrated, and Gaussian DP. Besides, we study the hypothesis needed to obtain the best composition bounds. Our theorems cover both parallel and sequential composition settings. Importantly, they also cover every setting in between, allowing us to compute the final privacy loss of a composition with greatly improved accuracy.
Patricia Guerra-Balboa, Àlex Miranda-Pascual, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten Strufe
CSF1
2023 SoK: Differentially Private Publication of Trajectory Data
abstract
Trajectory analysis holds many promises, from improvements in traffic management to routing advice or infrastructure development. However, learning users' paths is extremely privacy-invasive. Therefore, there is a necessity to protect trajectories such that we preserve the global properties, useful for analysis, while specific and private information of individuals remains inaccessible. Trajectories, however, are difficult to protect, since they are sequential, highly dimensional, correlated, bound to geophysical restrictions, and easily mapped to semantic points of interest. This paper aims to establish a systematic framework on protective masking and synthetic-generation measures for trajectory databases with syntactic and differentially private (DP) guarantees, including also utility properties, derived from ideas and limitations of existing proposals. To reach this goal, we systematize the utility metrics used throughout the literature, deeply analyze the DP granularity notions, explore and elaborate on the state of the art on privacy-enhancing mechanisms and their problems, and expose the main limitations of DP notions in the context of trajectories.
Àlex Miranda-Pascual, Patricia Guerra-Balboa, Javier Parra-Arnau, Jordi Forné, Thorsten Strufe
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2