Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dadi Guo
dblp:344/5410
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 81% Generative modeling · 19% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
diverse generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-Tuning · ACL (1) 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
language model privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmarking · 1.5reinforcement learning · 1.0prefix-conditioned fine-tuning · 1.0large reasoning model · 1.0benchmark evaluation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-TuningabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on hard reasoning and general instruction-following tasks.However, when sampling multiple outputs for the same prompt, they often produce highly homogeneous, repetitive responses, resulting in inefficient exploration.This limits the gains from test-time scaling and constrains the upper bound of reinforcement learning (RL) training.We attribute this issue in part to supervised fine-tuning (SFT): when a single prompt is paired with multiple reference responses, the model is trained to generate diverse outputs under the same prior condition, which induces optimization interference and can lead to diversity collapse.To address this, we propose Prefix-Conditioned SFT (P-SFT), a simple yet effective method that constructs semantically consistent yet distributionally distinct prior contents to different responses, thereby projecting the instruction into distinct latent regions to establish diverse prior distributions and decouple the one-to-many mapping.Experiments on large reasoning language models show that our approach improves absolute performance by 5.3% on reasoning benchmarks and increases generation diversity by 198.3% on average, while substantially enhancing output diversity and test-time scaling.Notably, even without any additional training, our prefixing strategy can be applied at inference time alone and still yields significant gains in both diversity and reasoning performance for instruction-tuned LLMs and reasoning-enhanced models. Zhiyuan Fan, Guanqiao Chen, Yanyi Huang, Mingkuan Zhao, Dadi Guo, Yi R. Fung 0001 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2026 | Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning ModelsabstractDadi Guo, Jiayu Liu, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He, Haoran Li, Yuxin Li, Yumeng Wang, Yi R. Fung. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Dadi Guo, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He 0001, Yumeng Wang 0010, Yi R. Fung 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language ModelsabstractHaoran Li, Dadi Guo, Donghao Li, Wei Fan, Qi Hu, Xin Liu, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao, Yangqiu Song. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Haoran Li 0003, Dadi Guo, Wei Fan 0001, Xin Liu 0039, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao 0001, Yangqiu Song |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | UDA-DP: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Software Defect PredictionabstractSoftware defect prediction can automatically locate defective code modules to focus testing resources better. Traditional defect prediction methods mainly focus on manually designing features, which are input into machine learning classifiers to identify defective code. However, there are mainly two problems in prior works. First manually designing features is time consuming and unable to capture the semantic information of programs, which is an important capability for accurate defect prediction. Second the labeled data is limited along with severe class imbalance, affecting the performance of defect prediction.In response to the above problems, we first propose a new unsupervised domain adaptation method using pseudo labels for defect prediction(UDA-DP). Compared to manually designed features, it can automatically extract defective features from source programs to save time and contain more semantic information of programs. Moreover, unsupervised domain adaptation using pseudo labels is a kind of transfer learning, which is effective in leveraging rich information of limited data, alleviating the problem of insufficient data.Experiments with 10 open source projects from the PROMISE data set show that our proposed UDA-DP method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for both within-project and cross-project defect predictions. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/xsarvin/UDA-DP. Xiaosong Huang, Yifan Wu 0002, Ying Li 0012, Hao Yu 0016, Dadi Guo, Zhonghai Wu |
SANER | 6 |