Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuxuan Tong

dblp:344/6238 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-5758-5954ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 41% Language models and text generation · 37% Generative modeling · 11%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement learning for language models
1.722025
DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale · NeurIPS 2025
Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
1.012026
Laminar: A Scalable Asynchronous RL Post-Training Framework · EuroSys 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › post-training
reinforcement learning post-training
1.012026
Laminar: A Scalable Asynchronous RL Post-Training Framework · EuroSys 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › chain-of-thought reasoning
long chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
mathematical problem solving
0.812024
DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › preference learning
human preference learning
0.712023
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
preference alignment
0.712023
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.712023
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.712023
ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
asynchronous training
0.312026
Laminar: A Scalable Asynchronous RL Post-Training Framework · EuroSys 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.212024
DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory-level asynchrony · 1.0dynamic repack · 1.0distributed parameter service · 1.0supervised fine-tuning · 0.9reward shaping · 0.9reinforcement learning at scale · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9policy optimization · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.8data synthesis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Laminar: A Scalable Asynchronous RL Post-Training Framework
abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training for Large Language Models (LLMs) is now scaling to large clusters and running for extended durations to enhance model reasoning performance. However, the scalability of existing RL frameworks is limited, as extreme long-tail skewness in RL trajectory generation causes severe GPU underutilization. Current asynchronous RL systems attempt to mitigate this, but they rely on global weight synchronization between the actor and all rollouts, which creates a rigid model update schedule. This global synchronization is ill-suited for the highly skewed and evolving distribution of trajectory generation latency in RL training, crippling training efficiency. Our key insight is that efficient scaling requires breaking this lockstep through trajectory-level asynchrony, which generates and consumes each trajectory independently. We propose Laminar, a scalable and robust RL post-training system built on a fully decoupled architecture. First, we replace global updates with a tier of relay workers acting as a distributed parameter service. This enables asynchronous and fine-grained weight synchronization, allowing rollouts to pull the latest weight anytime without stalling the actor's training loop. Second, a dynamic repack mechanism consolidates long-tail trajectories onto a few dedicated rollouts, maximizing generation throughput. The fully decoupled design also isolates failures, ensuring robustness for long-running jobs. Our evaluation on a 1024-GPU cluster shows that Laminar achieves up to 5.48$\times$ training throughput speedup over state-of-the-art systems, while reducing model convergence time.
Guangming Sheng, Yuxuan Tong, Borui Wan, Wang Zhang 0017, Chaobo Jia, Xibin Wu, Xiang Li 0067, Chi Zhang 0022, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, Xin Liu 0086, Chuan Wu 0001
EuroSys2
2025 Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
abstract
Scaling inference compute has become a key driver of advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs). A proven approach for scaling inference compute is to generate long chains-of-thought (CoTs), enabling models to engage in structured reasoning strategies such as backtracking and error correction. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a crucial method for developing these capabilities, yet the conditions under which long CoTs emerge remain unclear, and RL training requires careful design choices. In this study, we systematically investigate the underlying mechanics of long CoT reasoning—examining the factors that enable models to generate extended reasoning trajectories. Through extensive supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and RL experiments, we identify three key findings: 1) while SFT is not strictly necessary, it significantly simplifies training and improves efficiency; 2) reasoning capabilities tend to emerge with increased training compute but are not guaranteed, making reward shaping essential for stabilizing CoT length growth; and 3) scaling verifiable reward signals is critical for RL, and we find that leveraging noisy, web-extracted solutions with filtering mechanisms shows promising potential, particularly in out-of-distribution (OOD) reasoning tasks such as STEM problem-solving. These insights provide practical guidance for optimizing training strategies to enhance long CoT reasoning in LLMs.
Shiming Yang, Yuxuan Tong, Xinyao Niu, Graham Neubig, Xiang Yue
ICML2
2025 DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale
abstract
Inference scaling empowers LLMs with unprecedented reasoning ability, with reinforcement learning as the core technique to elicit complex reasoning. However, key technical details of state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs are concealed (such as in OpenAI o1 blog and DeepSeek R1 technical report), thus the community still struggles to reproduce their RL training results. We propose the **D**ecoupled Clip and **D**ynamic s**A**mpling **P**olicy **O**ptimization (**DAPO**) algorithm, and fully open-source a state-of-the-art large-scale RL system that achieves 50 points on AIME 2024 using Qwen2.5-32B base model. Unlike previous works that withhold training details, we introduce four key techniques of our algorithm that make large-scale LLM RL a success. In addition, we open-source our training code, which is built on the verl framework, along with a carefully curated and processed dataset. These components of our open-source system enhance reproducibility and support future research in large-scale LLM RL.
Qiying Yu, Zheng Zhang 0001, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan, Xiaochen Zuo, Yu Yue, Weinan Dai, Tiantian Fan, Gaohong Liu, Juncai Liu, Lingjun Liu, Xin Liu 0039, Haibin Lin, Bole Ma, Guangming Sheng, Yuxuan Tong, Chi Zhang 0022, Mofan Zhang, Ru Zhang 0006, Wang Zhang 0017, Jiaze Chen, Jiangjie Chen, Hongli Yu, Yuxuan Song 0002, Xiangpeng Wei, Hao Zhou 0012, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Mingxuan Wang
NeurIPS17
2024 DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving
abstract
Solving mathematical problems requires advanced reasoning abilities and presents notable challenges for large language models. Previous works usually synthesize data from proprietary models to augment existing datasets, followed by instruction tuning to achieve top-tier results. However, our analysis of these datasets reveals severe biases towards easy queries, with frequent failures to generate any correct response for the most challenging queries. Hypothesizing that difficult queries are crucial to learning complex reasoning, we propose *Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning* (`DART`), a method that allocates difficult queries more trials during the synthesis phase, enabling more extensive training on difficult samples. Utilizing `DART`, we have created new datasets for mathematical problem-solving that focus more on difficult queries and are substantially smaller than previous ones. Remarkably, our synthesis process solely relies on a 7B-sized open-weight model, without reliance on the commonly used proprietary GPT-4. We fine-tune various base models on our datasets ranging from 7B to 70B in size, resulting in a series of strong models called `DART-Math`. In comprehensive in-domain and out-of-domain evaluation on 6 mathematical benchmarks, `DART-Math` outperforms vanilla rejection tuning significantly, being superior or comparable to previous arts, despite using much smaller datasets and no proprietary models. Furthermore, our results position our synthetic datasets as the most effective and cost-efficient publicly available resources for advancing mathematical problem-solving. Our datasets, models and code are publicly available at https://github.com/hkust-nlp/dart-math.
Yuxuan Tong, Ruidong Wu, Junxian He
NeurIPS1
2023 ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation
abstract
We present a comprehensive solution to learn and improve text-to-image models from human preference feedback. To begin with, we build ImageReward---the first general-purpose text-to-image human preference reward model---to effectively encode human preferences. Its training is based on our systematic annotation pipeline including rating and ranking, which collects 137k expert comparisons to date. In human evaluation, ImageReward outperforms existing scoring models and metrics, making it a promising automatic metric for evaluating text-to-image synthesis. On top of it, we propose Reward Feedback Learning (ReFL), a direct tuning algorithm to optimize diffusion models against a scorer. Both automatic and human evaluation support ReFL's advantages over compared methods. All code and datasets are provided at \url{https://github.com/THUDM/ImageReward}.
Jiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu 0036, Yuxuan Tong, Qinkai Li, Ming Ding 0004, Jie Tang 0001, Yuxiao Dong
NeurIPS4