Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Zhangcong She

dblp:344/7898 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 87% 3D vision · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot calibration
hand-eye calibration
0.812024
GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot calibration
0.812024
GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.212024
GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
robot-assisted surgery
0.212024
GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression methods · 1.5geometry-based calibration · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration
abstract
Hand-eye calibration is the problem of solving the transformation from the end-effector of a robot to the sensor attached to it. Commonly employed techniques, such as AXXB or AXZB formulations, rely on regression methods that require collecting pose data from different robot configurations, which can produce low accuracy and repeatability. However, the derived transformation should solely depend on the geometry of the end-effector and the sensor attachment. We propose Geometry-Based End-Effector Calibration (GBEC) that enhances the repeatability and accuracy of the derived transformation compared to traditional hand-eye calibrations. To demonstrate improvements, we apply the approach to two different robot-assisted procedures: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and femoroplasty. We also discuss the generalizability of GBEC for camera-in-hand and marker-in-hand sensor mounting methods. In the experiments, we perform GBEC between the robot end-effector and an optical tracker’s rigid body marker attached to the TMS coil or femoroplasty drill guide. Previous research documents low repeatability and accuracy of the conventional methods for robot-assisted TMS hand-eye calibration. Applying GBEC to repeated calibrations, we obtain transformations with standard deviations of 0.37mm, 0.65mm, and 0.40mm (translation) along x, y, and z axes of the end-effector, respectively. The tool alignment experiments after using GBEC achieve a mean accuracy around 0.2mm in Euclidean distance. When compared to some existing methods, the proposed method relies solely on the geometry of the flange and the pose of the rigid-body marker, making it independent of workspace constraints or robot accuracy, without sacrificing the orthogonality of the rotation matrix. Our results validate the accuracy and applicability of the approach, providing a new and generalizable methodology for obtaining the transformation from the end-effector to a sensor.
Yihao Liu 0004, Zhangcong She, Amir Kheradmand, Mehran Armand
ICRA3