EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhangcong She
dblp:344/7898
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 87% 3D vision · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot calibration
hand-eye calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024 |
Medical and health informatics › surgical robotics
robot-assisted surgery |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye Calibration · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression methods · 1.5geometry-based calibration · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | GBEC: Geometry-Based Hand-Eye CalibrationabstractHand-eye calibration is the problem of solving the transformation from the end-effector of a robot to the sensor attached to it. Commonly employed techniques, such as AXXB or AXZB formulations, rely on regression methods that require collecting pose data from different robot configurations, which can produce low accuracy and repeatability. However, the derived transformation should solely depend on the geometry of the end-effector and the sensor attachment. We propose Geometry-Based End-Effector Calibration (GBEC) that enhances the repeatability and accuracy of the derived transformation compared to traditional hand-eye calibrations. To demonstrate improvements, we apply the approach to two different robot-assisted procedures: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and femoroplasty. We also discuss the generalizability of GBEC for camera-in-hand and marker-in-hand sensor mounting methods. In the experiments, we perform GBEC between the robot end-effector and an optical tracker’s rigid body marker attached to the TMS coil or femoroplasty drill guide. Previous research documents low repeatability and accuracy of the conventional methods for robot-assisted TMS hand-eye calibration. Applying GBEC to repeated calibrations, we obtain transformations with standard deviations of 0.37mm, 0.65mm, and 0.40mm (translation) along x, y, and z axes of the end-effector, respectively. The tool alignment experiments after using GBEC achieve a mean accuracy around 0.2mm in Euclidean distance. When compared to some existing methods, the proposed method relies solely on the geometry of the flange and the pose of the rigid-body marker, making it independent of workspace constraints or robot accuracy, without sacrificing the orthogonality of the rotation matrix. Our results validate the accuracy and applicability of the approach, providing a new and generalizable methodology for obtaining the transformation from the end-effector to a sensor. Yihao Liu 0004, Zhangcong She, Amir Kheradmand, Mehran Armand |
ICRA | 3 |