Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tsukasa Uranaka
dblp:344/8364
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9346-6456ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 87% Health and well-being technologies · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology
deaf and hard of hearing technology |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | asEars: Designing and Evaluating the User Experience of Wearable Assistive Devices for Single-Sided Deafness · CHI 2023 |
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
wearable assistive device |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | asEars: Designing and Evaluating the User Experience of Wearable Assistive Devices for Single-Sided Deafness · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diary study · 0.7design probe · 0.7comparative user study · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | asEars: Designing and Evaluating the User Experience of Wearable Assistive Devices for Single-Sided DeafnessabstractSingle-sided deafness (SSD) significantly restricts social participation in hearing/speaking cultures due to the person’s difficulty hearing conversations on their deaf side. Although hearing aids for SSD are effective in social situations, the acceptance rate remains low at 4%. To address this problem, we designed and developed a bone conduction-based device to be worn with eyeglasses, involving 53 individuals with SSD including two authors. We conducted a four-week diary study comparing our proposed device with traditional Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) hearing aids and explored the factors that might affect the acceptance rate of assistive devices for SSD. The findings indicated that our design was more acceptable for users with SSD due to its effectiveness, social acceptability, and the ability for wearers to use other devices simultaneously, such as earbuds. Based on our results, we discuss implications for designing wearable assistive devices to promote greater acceptance among the target population. Ken Takaki, Etsushi Nozaki, Tomomi Kanai, Ari Hautasaari, Akinori Kashio, Daisuke Sato 0001, Teru Kamogashira, Tsukasa Uranaka, Shinji Urata, Hajime Koyama, Tatsuya Yamasoba, Yoshihiro Kawahara |
CHI | 8 |