Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Xiaohang Zhao

dblp:344/8631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7259-1901ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 44% High-performance computing · 44% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.712023
Space Efficient Sequence Alignment for SRAM-Based Computing: X-Drop on the Graphcore IPU · SC 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
scientific computing accelerator
0.712023
Space Efficient Sequence Alignment for SRAM-Based Computing: X-Drop on the Graphcore IPU · SC 2023
High-performance computing
sequence alignment
0.712023
Space Efficient Sequence Alignment for SRAM-Based Computing: X-Drop on the Graphcore IPU · SC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

x-drop algorithm · 1.3SRAM-based computing · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Space Efficient Sequence Alignment for SRAM-Based Computing: X-Drop on the Graphcore IPU
abstract
Dedicated accelerator hardware has become essential for processing AI-based workloads, leading to the rise of novel accelerator architectures. Furthermore, fundamental differences in memory architecture and parallelism have made these accelerators targets for scientific computing.
Luk Burchard, Max Xiaohang Zhao, Johannes Langguth, Aydin Buluç, Giulia Guidi
SC2
2021 BeFaaS: An Application-Centric Benchmarking Framework for FaaS Platforms
abstract
Following the increasing interest and adoption of FaaS systems, benchmarking frameworks for determining nonfunctional properties have also emerged. While existing (microbenchmark) frameworks only evaluate single aspects of FaaS platforms, a more holistic, application-driven approach is still missing. In this paper, we design and present BeFaaS, an extensible application-centric benchmarking framework for FaaS environments that focuses on the evaluation of FaaS platforms through realistic and typical examples of FaaS applications. BeFaaS includes a built-in e-commerce benchmark, is extensible for new workload profiles and new platforms, supports federated benchmark runs in which the benchmark application is distributed over multiple providers, and supports a fine-grained result analysis. Our evaluation compares three major FaaS providers in single cloud provider setups and shows that BeFaaS is capable of running each benchmark automatically with minimal configuration effort and providing detailed insights for each interaction.
Martin Grambow, Tobias Pfandzelter, Luk Burchard, Carsten Schubert, Max Xiaohang Zhao, David Bermbach
IC2E5