Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Derek Andersen

dblp:344/9134 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 77% Learning theory · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
sequence classification
0.812024
MLRegTest: A Benchmark for the Machine Learning of Regular Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Automata and formal languages
regular languages
0.812024
MLRegTest: A Benchmark for the Machine Learning of Regular Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Automata and formal languages › grammatical inference
regular language learning
0.812024
MLRegTest: A Benchmark for the Machine Learning of Regular Languages · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.5RNN · 1.5LSTM · 1.5GRU · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MLRegTest: A Benchmark for the Machine Learning of Regular Languages
abstract
Synthetic datasets constructed from formal languages allow fine-grained examination of the learning and generalization capabilities of machine learning systems for sequence classification. This article presents a new benchmark for machine learning systems on sequence classification called MLRegTest, which contains training, development, and test sets from 1,800 regular languages. Different kinds of formal languages represent different kinds of long-distance dependencies, and correctly identifying long-distance dependencies in sequences is a known challenge for ML systems to generalize successfully. MLRegTest organizes its languages according to their logical complexity (monadic second order, first order, propositional, or restricted propositional) and the kind of logical literals (string, tier-string, subsequence, or combinations thereof). The logical complexity and choice of literal provides a systematic way to understand different kinds of long-distance dependencies in regular languages, and therefore to understand the capacities of different ML systems to learn such long-distance dependencies. Finally, the performance of different neural networks (simple RNN, LSTM, GRU, transformer) on MLRegTest is examined. The main conclusion is that performance depends significantly on the kind of test set, the class of language, and the neural network architecture.
Sam van der Poel, Dakotah Lambert, Kalina Kostyszyn, Tiantian Gao, Rahul Verma, Derek Andersen, Joanne Chau, Emily Peterson, Cody St. Clair, Paul Fodor, Chihiro Shibata, Jeffrey Heinz
J. Mach. Learn. Res.6