Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karthik Shamanna
dblp:345/0153
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8514-7655ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 44% Collaborative and social computing · 44% Human-AI interaction · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
care work |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Intermediated Workflows for Hybrid Telemedicine · CHI 2023 |
Health and well-being technologies
telemedicine |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Intermediated Workflows for Hybrid Telemedicine · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative study · 0.7interviews · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Towards Intermediated Workflows for Hybrid TelemedicineabstractThe growing platformization of health has spurred new avenues for healthcare access and reinvigorated telemedicine as a viable pathway to care. Telemedicine adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic has surfaced barriers to patient-centered care that call for attention. Our work extends current Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research on telemedicine and the challenges to remote care, and investigates the scope for enhancing remote care seeking and provision through telemedicine workflows involving intermediation. Our study, focused on the urban Indian context, involved providing doctors with videos of remote clinical examinations to aid in telemedicine. We present a qualitative evaluation of this modified telemedicine experience, highlighting how workflows involving intermediation could bridge existing gaps in telemedicine, and how their acceptance among doctors could shift interaction dynamics between doctors and patients. We conclude by discussing the implications of such telemedicine workflows on patient-centered care and the future of care work. Karthik S. Bhat, Neha Kumar 0001, Karthik Shamanna, Nipun Kwatra |
CHI | 3 |