Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna Lieb
dblp:345/0227
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5493-0487ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization design
dashboard design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community Dynamics · CHI 2023 |
Collaborative and social computing › peer production
open source communities |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community Dynamics · CHI 2023 |
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open-source maintainers |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community Dynamics · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
think-aloud study · 2.0survey · 2.0literature review · 2.0diary study · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Online News Coverage of Critical Race Theory Controversies: A Dataset of Annotated HeadlinesabstractIn this paper, we introduce an annotated dataset of 11,704 unique U.S. news headlines related to critical race theory and its controversies from August 2020 through December 2022. Annotations generated by GPT-4 specify the headline stance and the primary actor in the headline. GPT-4 annotations performed well on the validation dataset, with weighted average F-scores of 0.8339 for headline stance annotations and 0.7625 for primary actor annotations. Along with the annotated headlines and URLs to the full article, we augment the dataset with metrics that are relevant to future research on political polarization, news frame analysis, and regional news coverage. The dataset includes partisan audience bias scores by news source domain, tags for mentions of U.S. states in the article body, and exposure and engagement metrics for articles shared on Reddit. Among other preliminary descriptive analyses, we find that the most prevalent headline stance in our headlines dataset is anti-CRT (43.06%), and the most prevalent primary actor in our headlines dataset is political influencers (56.56%). This paper describes the data collection methodology, preliminary descriptive analysis, and possible uses of the dataset for future research in political science, computational social sciences, and natural language processing. Our dataset and replication code is available to access on Zenodo at zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10516190 Anna Lieb, Maneesh Arora, Eni Mustafaraj |
ICWSM | 1 |
| 2023 | Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community DynamicsabstractOpen-source software projects have become an integral part of our daily life, supporting virtually every software we use today. Since open-source software forms the digital infrastructure, maintaining them is of utmost importance. We present Climate Coach, a dashboard that helps open-source project maintainers monitor the health of their community in terms of team climate and inclusion. Through a literature review and an exploratory survey (N=18), we identified important signals that can reflect a project’s health, and display them on a dashboard. We evaluated and refined our dashboard through two rounds of think-aloud studies (N=19). We then conducted a two-week longitudinal diary study (N=10) to test the usefulness of our dashboard. We found that displaying signals that are related to a project’s inclusion help improve maintainers’ management strategies. Huilian Sophie Qiu, Anna Lieb, Jennifer Chou, Megan Carneal, Jasmine Mok, Emily Amspoker, Bogdan Vasilescu, Laura A. Dabbish |
CHI | 2 |