Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Verena Ingrid Prantl

dblp:345/7956 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-9792-729XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
data visualization
1.012026
Untangling Rhetoric, Pathos, and Aesthetics in Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › data storytelling
infographic authoring
1.012026
InfoAlign: A Human-AI Co-Creation System for Storytelling with Infographics · CHI 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization design
visualization rhetoric
1.012026
Untangling Rhetoric, Pathos, and Aesthetics in Data Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Human-AI interaction
human-AI co-creation
1.012026
InfoAlign: A Human-AI Co-Creation System for Storytelling with Infographics · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system evaluation · 2.0quantitative analysis · 2.0formative interviews · 2.0historical analysis · 1.0campbell's seven circumstances · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 InfoAlign: A Human-AI Co-Creation System for Storytelling with Infographics
abstract
Storytelling infographics are a powerful medium for communicating data-driven stories through visual presentation. However, existing authoring tools lack support for maintaining story consistency and aligning with users’ story goals throughout the design process. To address this gap, we conducted formative interviews and a quantitative analysis to identify design needs and common story-informed layout patterns in infographics. Based on these insights, we propose a narrative-centric workflow for infographic creation consisting of three phases: story construction, visual encoding, and spatial composition. Building on this workflow, we developed InfoAlign, a human–AI co-creation system that transforms long or unstructured text into stories, recommends semantically aligned visual designs, and generates layout blueprints. Users can intervene and refine the design at any stage, ensuring their intent is preserved and the infographic creation process remains transparent. Evaluations show that InfoAlign preserves story coherence across authoring stages and effectively supports human–AI co-creation for storytelling infographic design.
Jielin Feng, Xinwu Ye, Qianhui Li, Verena Ingrid Prantl, Jun-Hsiang Yao, Yuheng Zhao, Yun Wang 0012, Siming Chen 0001
CHI4
2026 Untangling Rhetoric, Pathos, and Aesthetics in Data Visualization
abstract
Contemporary discourse on data communication has discussed logos (reason) and, more recently, ethos (credibility) extensively. While the concept of pathos (emotional appeal) has received growing attention in the visualization community in recent years, its connection to related concepts such as rhetoric and aesthetics remains underexplored. In this paper, we provide working definitions of these terms, contextualize them within data visualization, and explore their overlaps and differences in light of their historical development. This historical perspective offers a more holistic understanding of how these approaches in science and philosophy have evolved over time, contributing to a deeper comprehension of their integration into the design process. Drawing on Campbell's seven circumstances, we illustrate how pathos functions as a rhetorical strategy in contemporary data visualizations, examining the interplay of rhetorical strategies, aesthetic qualities, and offering our interpretation of how these elements work together.
Verena Ingrid Prantl, Torsten Möller, Laura Koesten
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1