Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex Sansfaçon-Buchanan

dblp:345/8353 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 67% Logic in computer science · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
hybrid system model checking
0.712023
Verifying linear temporal specifications of constant-rate multi-mode systems · LICS 2023
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › temporal logic model checking
LTL model checking
0.712023
Verifying linear temporal specifications of constant-rate multi-mode systems · LICS 2023
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.712023
Verifying linear temporal specifications of constant-rate multi-mode systems · LICS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

complexity landscape · 0.7LTL fragments · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Verifying linear temporal specifications of constant-rate multi-mode systems
abstract
Constant-rate multi-mode systems (MMS) are hybrid systems with finitely many modes and real-valued variables that evolve over continuous time according to mode-specific constant rates. We introduce a variant of linear temporal logic (LTL) for MMS, and we investigate the complexity of the model-checking problem for syntactic fragments of LTL. We obtain a complexity landscape where each fragment is either P-complete, NP-complete or undecidable. These results generalize and unify several results on MMS and continuous counter systems.
Michael Blondin, Philip Offtermatt, Alex Sansfaçon-Buchanan
LICS3