Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Duanyi Yao

dblp:345/8638 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8520-4069ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
6 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 72% Privacy and data protection · 28%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 49% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
1.422024
HiFGL: A Hierarchical Framework for Cross-silo Cross-device Federated Graph Learning · KDD 2024
FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Models · ICML 2023
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving machine learning
1.422024
HiFGL: A Hierarchical Framework for Cross-silo Cross-device Federated Graph Learning · KDD 2024
FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Models · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › backdoor defense
backdoor detection
0.912025
DeDe: Detecting Backdoor Samples for SSL Encoders via Decoders · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised pre-trained encoder
0.912025
DeDe: Detecting Backdoor Samples for SSL Encoders via Decoders · CVPR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack
0.912025
DeDe: Detecting Backdoor Samples for SSL Encoders via Decoders · CVPR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack › backdoor defense
backdoor detection
0.912025
DeDe: Detecting Backdoor Samples for SSL Encoders via Decoders · CVPR 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
data reconstruction attack
0.912025
URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning · NDSS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning security
0.912025
URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning · NDSS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
privacy attack
0.912025
URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning · NDSS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning security
vertical federated learning attack
0.912025
URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning · NDSS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated graph learning
0.812024
HiFGL: A Hierarchical Framework for Cross-silo Cross-device Federated Graph Learning · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
HiFGL: A Hierarchical Framework for Cross-silo Cross-device Federated Graph Learning · KDD 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example
0.812024
Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit · ICLR 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning
0.812024
Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit · ICLR 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
language model privacy
0.812024
PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Privacy and data protection
privacy evaluation
0.812024
PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › federated learning privacy
vertical federated learning
0.812024
Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated learning architecture
vertical federated learning
0.712023
FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Models · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.212024
Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit · ICLR 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
thompson sampling
0.212024
Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decoder reconstruction · 1.7auxiliary dataset · 1.7thompson sampling · 1.5secret message passing · 1.5multi-armed bandit · 1.5hierarchical architecture · 1.5benchmarking · 1.5adversarial example generation · 1.5information-theoretic privacy · 1.3reconstruction attack · 0.9secret sharing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DeDe: Detecting Backdoor Samples for SSL Encoders via Decoders
abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is pervasively exploited in training high-quality upstream encoders with a large amount of unlabeled data. However, it is found to be susceptible to backdoor attacks merely via polluting a small portion of training data. The victim encoders associate triggered inputs with target embeddings, e.g., mapping a triggered cat image to an airplane embedding, such that the downstream tasks inherit unintended behaviors when the trigger is activated. Emerging backdoor attacks have shown great threats across different SSL paradigms such as contrastive learning and CLIP, yet limited research is devoted to defending against such attacks, and existing defenses fall short in detecting advanced stealthy backdoors. To address the limitations, we propose a novel detection mechanism, DeDe, which detects the activation of backdoor mappings caused by triggered inputs on victim encoders. Specifically, DeDe trains a decoder for any given SSL encoder using an auxiliary dataset (which can be out-of-distribution or even slightly poisoned), so that for any triggered input that misleads the encoder into the target embedding, the decoder generates an output image significantly different from the input. DeDe leverages the discrepancy between the input and the decoded output to identify potential backdoor misbehavior during inference. We empirically evaluate DeDe on both contrastive learning and CLIP models against various types of backdoor attacks. Our results demonstrate promising detection effectiveness over various advanced attacks and superior performance compared over state-of-the-art detection methods.
Sizai Hou, Duanyi Yao
CVPR3
2025 URVFL: Undetectable Data Reconstruction Attack on Vertical Federated Learning
Duanyi Yao, Xueluan Gong, Sizai Hou
NDSS1
2024 PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models
abstract
Haoran Li, Dadi Guo, Donghao Li, Wei Fan, Qi Hu, Xin Liu, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao, Yangqiu Song. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Haoran Li 0003, Dadi Guo, Wei Fan 0001, Xin Liu 0039, Chunkit Chan, Duanyi Yao, Yuan Yao 0001, Yangqiu Song
ACL (1)8
2024 Constructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit
abstract
Vertical federated learning (VFL), where each participating client holds a subset of data features, has found numerous applications in finance, healthcare, and IoT systems. However, adversarial attacks, particularly through the injection of adversarial examples (AEs), pose serious challenges to the security of VFL models. In this paper, we investigate such vulnerabilities through developing a novel attack to disrupt the VFL inference process, under a practical scenario where the adversary is able to *adaptively corrupt a subset of clients*. We formulate the problem of finding optimal attack strategies as an online optimization problem, which is decomposed into an inner problem of adversarial example generation (AEG) and an outer problem of corruption pattern selection (CPS). Specifically, we establish the equivalence between the formulated CPS problem and a multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, and propose the Thompson sampling with Empirical maximum reward (E-TS) algorithm for the adversary to efficiently identify the optimal subset of clients for corruption. The key idea of E-TS is to introduce an estimation of the expected maximum reward for each arm, which helps to specify a small set of *competitive arms*, on which the exploration for the optimal arm is performed. This significantly reduces the exploration space, which otherwise can quickly become prohibitively large as the number of clients increases. We analytically characterize the regret bound of E-TS, and empirically demonstrate its capability of efficiently revealing the optimal corruption pattern with the highest attack success rate, under various datasets of popular VFL tasks.
Duanyi Yao, Ye Xue
ICLR1
2024 HiFGL: A Hierarchical Framework for Cross-silo Cross-device Federated Graph Learning
abstract
Federated Graph Learning (FGL) has emerged as a promising way to learn high-quality representations from distributed graph data with privacy preservation. Despite considerable efforts have been made for FGL under either cross-device or cross-silo paradigm, how to effectively capture graph knowledge in a more complicated cross-silo cross-device environment remains an under-explored problem. However, this task is challenging because of the inherent hierarchy and heterogeneity of decentralized clients, diversified privacy constraints in different clients, and the cross-client graph integrity requirement. To this end, in this paper, we propose a Hierarchical Federated Graph Learning (HiFGL) framework for cross-silo cross-device FGL. Specifically, we devise a unified hierarchical architecture to safeguard federated GNN training on heterogeneous clients while ensuring graph integrity. Moreover, we propose a Secret Message Passing (SecMP) scheme to shield unauthorized access to subgraph-level and node-level sensitive information simultaneously. Theoretical analysis proves that HiFGL achieves multi-level privacy preservation with complexity guarantees. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate the superiority of the proposed framework against several baselines. Furthermore, HiFGL's versatile nature allows for its application in either solely cross-silo or cross-device settings, further broadening its utility in real-world FGL applications.
Zhuoning Guo, Duanyi Yao, Hao Liu 0026
KDD2
2023 FedVS: Straggler-Resilient and Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Split Models
abstract
In a vertical federated learning (VFL) system consisting of a central server and many distributed clients, the training data are vertically partitioned such that different features are privately stored on different clients. The problem of split VFL is to train a model split between the server and the clients. This paper aims to address two major challenges in split VFL: 1) performance degradation due to straggling clients during training; and 2) data and model privacy leakage from clients’ uploaded data embeddings. We propose FedVS to simultaneously address these two challenges. The key idea of FedVS is to design secret sharing schemes for the local data and models, such that information-theoretical privacy against colluding clients and curious server is guaranteed, and the aggregation of all clients’ embeddings is reconstructed losslessly, via decrypting computation shares from the non-straggling clients. Extensive experiments on various types of VFL datasets (including tabular, CV, and multi-view) demonstrate the universal advantages of FedVS in straggler mitigation and privacy protection over baseline protocols.
Duanyi Yao
ICML2