In high-speed quadcopter racing, finding a single controller that works well across different platforms remains challenging. This work presents the first neural network controller for drone racing that generalizes across physically distinct quadcopters. We demonstrate that a single network, trained with domain randomization, can robustly control various types of quadcopters. The network relies solely on the current state to directly compute motor commands. The effectiveness of this generalized controller is validated through real-world tests on two substantially different crafts (3-inch and 5-inch race quadcopters). We further compare the performance of this generalized controller with controllers specifically trained for the 3-inch and 5-inch drone, using their identified model parameters with varying levels of domain randomization (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%). While the generalized controller shows slightly slower speeds compared to the fine-tuned models, it excels in adaptability across different platforms. Our results show that no randomization fails sim-to-real transfer while increasing randomization improves robustness but reduces speed. Despite this trade-off, our findings highlight the potential of domain randomization for generalizing controllers, paving the way for universal AI controllers that can adapt to any platform.

Aggressive time-optimal control of quadcopters poses a significant challenge in the field of robotics. The state-of-the-art approach leverages reinforcement learning (RL) to train optimal neural policies. However, a critical hurdle is the sim-to-real gap, often addressed by employing a robust inner loop controller —an abstraction that, in theory, constrains the optimality of the trained controller, necessitating margins to counter potential disturbances. In contrast, our novel approach introduces high-speed quadcopter control using end-to-end RL (E2E) that gives direct motor commands. To bridge the reality gap, we incorporate a learned residual model and an adaptive method that can compensate for modeling errors in thrust and moments. We compare our E2E approach against a state-of-the-art network that commands thrust and body rates to an INDI inner loop controller, both in simulated and real-world flight. E2E showcases a significant 1.39-second advantage in simulation and a 0.17-second edge in real-world testing, highlighting end-to-end reinforcement learning’s potential. The performance drop observed from simulation to reality shows potential for further improvement, including refining strategies to address the reality gap or exploring offline reinforcement learning with real flight data.