Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zaharah Bukhsh
dblp:346/0206
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3037-8998ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 62% Graph learning · 19% Reinforcement learning · 19% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
dynamic algorithm configuration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
multi-objective combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms on Real-world Data: How Many Do We Need? · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
unsupervised anomaly detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms on Real-world Data: How Many Do We Need? · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms on Real-world Data: How Many Do We Need? · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov decision process · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7evolutionary computation · 1.7deep reinforcement learning · 1.7k-nearest neighbor · 0.8isolation forest · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Self-supervise ensemble for extreme imbalance data streams with concept drift
Yiming Teng, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang 0001 |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2025 | Search Trajectory Network-Enhanced Multi-Objective Dynamic Algorithm ConfigurationabstractDeep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as an effective technique for dynamic algorithm configuration, particularly in evolutionary computation, enabling adaptive parameter updates during algorithmic execution. DRL-based methods have shown broad applicability across different problem domains and are designed to configure algorithms without problem-specific information, making them highly transferable across problem variants and scalable to different problem sizes. This paper proposes a novel graph neural network-based approach that learns representations of Search Trajectory Networks (STNs) to track the convergence behavior of multiple objectives and dynamically reconfigures multi-objective evolutionary algorithms during execution. By capturing how solutions evolve and interact over time, the STN-based state representation enables real-time insight into convergence, diversity, and their trade-offs, facilitating more informed and adaptive configuration decisions. Extensive experiments indicate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art DRL-based algorithm configuration methods. It also demonstrates good scalability to large problem instances and effectiveness in real-world optimization problems, which are often computationally expensive to tune. Robbert Reijnen, Zaharah Bukhsh, Hoong Chuin Lau, Yaoxin Wu, Yingqian Zhang 0001 |
ECAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Graph-Supported Dynamic Algorithm Configuration for Multi-Objective Combinatorial OptimizationabstractDeep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been widely used for dynamic algorithm configuration, particularly in evolutionary computation, which benefits from the adaptive update of parameters during the algorithmic execution. However, applying DRL to algorithm configuration for multi-objective combinatorial optimization (MOCO) problems remains relatively unexplored. This paper presents a novel graph neural network (GNN) based DRL to configure multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. We model the dynamic algorithm configuration as a Markov decision process, representing the convergence of solutions in the objective space by a graph, with their embeddings learned by a GNN to enhance the state representation. Experiments on diverse MOCO challenges indicate that our method outperforms traditional and DRL-based algorithm configuration methods in terms of efficacy and adaptability. It also exhibits advantageous generalizability across objective types and problem sizes, and applicability to different evolutionary computation methods. Robbert Reijnen, Yaoxin Wu, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | Offline reinforcement learning for learning to dispatch for job shop schedulingabstractThe Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) is a complex combinatorial optimization problem. While online Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promise by quickly finding acceptable solutions for JSSP, it faces key limitations: it requires extensive training interactions from scratch leading to sample inefficiency, cannot leverage existing high-quality solutions from traditional methods like Constraint Programming (CP), and require simulated environments to train in, which are impracticable to build for complex scheduling environments. We introduce Offline Learned Dispatching (Offline-LD), an offline reinforcement learning approach for JSSP, which addresses these limitations by learning from historical scheduling data. Our approach is motivated by scenarios where historical scheduling data and expert solutions are available or scenarios where online training of RL approaches with simulated environments is impracticable. Offline-LD introduces maskable variants of two Q-learning methods, namely, Maskable Quantile Regression DQN (mQRDQN) and discrete maskable Soft Actor-Critic (d-mSAC), that are able to learn from historical data, through Conservative Q-Learning (CQL), whereby we present a novel entropy bonus modification for d-mSAC, for maskable action spaces. Moreover, we introduce a novel reward normalization method for JSSP in an offline RL setting. Our experiments demonstrate that Offline-LD outperforms online RL on both generated and benchmark instances when trained on only 100 solutions generated by CP. Notably, introducing noise to the expert dataset yields comparable or superior results to using the expert dataset, with the same amount of instances, a promising finding for real-world applications, where data is inherently noisy and imperfect. Jesse van Remmerden, Zaharah Bukhsh, Yingqian Zhang 0001 |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2025 | Deep multi-objective reinforcement learning for utility-based infrastructural maintenance optimizationabstractIn this paper, we introduce multi-objective deep centralized multi-agent actor-critic (MO-DCMAC), a multi-objective reinforcement learning method for infrastructural maintenance optimization, an area traditionally dominated by single-objective reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. Previous single-objective RL methods combine multiple objectives, such as probability of collapse and cost, into a singular reward signal through reward-shaping. In contrast, MO-DCMAC can optimize a policy for multiple objectives directly, even when the utility function is nonlinear. We evaluated MO-DCMAC using two utility functions, which use probability of collapse and cost as input. The first utility function is the threshold utility, in which MO-DCMAC should minimize cost so that the probability of collapse is never above the threshold. The second is based on the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis methodology used by asset managers to assess maintenance plans. We evaluated MO-DCMAC, with both utility functions, in multiple maintenance environments, including ones based on a case study of the historical quay walls of Amsterdam. The performance of MO-DCMAC was compared against multiple rule-based policies based on heuristics currently used for constructing maintenance plans. Our results demonstrate that MO-DCMAC outperforms traditional rule-based policies across various environments and utility functions. Jesse van Remmerden, Maurice Kenter, Diederik M. Roijers, Charalampos Andriotis, Yingqian Zhang 0001, Zaharah Bukhsh |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 6 |
| 2024 | Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms on Real-world Data: How Many Do We Need?abstractIn this study we evaluate 33 unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms on 52 real-world multivariate tabular data sets, performing the largest comparison of unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms to date. On this collection of data sets, the EIF (Extended Isolation Forest) algorithm significantly outperforms the most other algorithms. Visualizing and then clustering the relative performance of the considered algorithms on all data sets, we identify two clear clusters: one with "local” data sets, and another with "global” data sets. "Local” anomalies occupy a region with low density when compared to nearby samples, while "global” occupy an overall low density region in the feature space. On the local data sets the $k$NN ($k$-nearest neighbor) algorithm comes out on top. On the global data sets, the EIF (extended isolation forest) algorithm performs the best. Also taking into consideration the algorithms' computational complexity, a toolbox with these two unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms suffices for finding anomalies in this representative collection of multivariate data sets. By providing access to code and data sets, our study can be easily reproduced and extended with more algorithms and/or data sets. Roel Bouman, Zaharah Bukhsh, Tom Heskes |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |