EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joseph Gentle
dblp:346/0408
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-9322-1973ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › distributed interactive applications › collaborative computing
distributed collaborative editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed coordination
operational transformation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
peer-to-peer collaboration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, SmallerabstractCollaborative text editing algorithms allow several users to concurrently modify a text file, and automatically merge concurrent edits into a consistent state. Existing algorithms fall in two categories: Operational Transformation (OT) algorithms are slow to merge files that have diverged substantially due to offline editing; CRDTs are slow to load and consume a lot of memory. We introduce Eg-walker, a collaboration algorithm for text that avoids these weaknesses. Compared to existing CRDTs, it consumes an order of magnitude less memory in the steady state, and loading a document from disk is orders of magnitude faster. Compared to OT, merging long-running branches is orders of magnitude faster. In the worst case, the merging performance of Eg-walker is comparable with existing CRDT algorithms. Eg-walker can be used everywhere CRDTs are used, including peer-to-peer systems without a central server. By offering performance that is competitive with centralised algorithms, our result paves the way towards the widespread adoption of peer-to-peer collaboration software. Joseph Gentle, Martin Kleppmann |
EuroSys | 1 |