Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Gentle

dblp:346/0408 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-9322-1973ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed interactive applications › collaborative computing
distributed collaborative editing
0.912025
Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025
Distributed systems › distributed coordination
operational transformation
0.912025
Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
peer-to-peer collaboration
0.912025
Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller · EuroSys 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Collaborative Text Editing with Eg-walker: Better, Faster, Smaller
abstract
Collaborative text editing algorithms allow several users to concurrently modify a text file, and automatically merge concurrent edits into a consistent state. Existing algorithms fall in two categories: Operational Transformation (OT) algorithms are slow to merge files that have diverged substantially due to offline editing; CRDTs are slow to load and consume a lot of memory. We introduce Eg-walker, a collaboration algorithm for text that avoids these weaknesses. Compared to existing CRDTs, it consumes an order of magnitude less memory in the steady state, and loading a document from disk is orders of magnitude faster. Compared to OT, merging long-running branches is orders of magnitude faster. In the worst case, the merging performance of Eg-walker is comparable with existing CRDT algorithms. Eg-walker can be used everywhere CRDTs are used, including peer-to-peer systems without a central server. By offering performance that is competitive with centralised algorithms, our result paves the way towards the widespread adoption of peer-to-peer collaboration software.
Joseph Gentle, Martin Kleppmann
EuroSys1