EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lukas Braun
dblp:346/1023
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 45% Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
deep linear networks |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Not all solutions are created equal: An analytical dissociation of functional and representational similarity in deep linear neural networks · ICML 2025 Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledge · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning dynamics |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | From Lazy to Rich: Exact Learning Dynamics in Deep Linear Networks · ICLR 2025 Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledge · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation similarity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Not all solutions are created equal: An analytical dissociation of functional and representational similarity in deep linear neural networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledge · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledge · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
numerical simulation · 0.9neural tangent kernel · 0.9multivariate pattern analysis · 0.9matrix riccati equation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | From Lazy to Rich: Exact Learning Dynamics in Deep Linear NetworksabstractBiological and artificial neural networks develop internal representations that enable them to perform complex tasks. In artificial networks, the effectiveness of these models relies on their ability to build task specific representation, a process influenced by interactions among datasets, architectures, initialization strategies, and optimization algorithms. Prior studies highlight that different initializations can place networks in either a lazy regime, where representations remain static, or a rich/feature learning regime, where representations evolve dynamically. Here, we examine how initialization influences learning dynamics in deep linear neural networks, deriving exact solutions for lambda-balanced initializations-defined by the relative scale of weights across layers. These solutions capture the evolution of representations and the Neural Tangent Kernel across the spectrum from the rich to the lazy regimes. Our findings deepen the theoretical understanding of the impact of weight initialization on learning regimes, with implications for continual learning, reversal learning, and transfer learning, relevant to both neuroscience and practical applications. Clémentine C. J. Dominé, Nicolas Anguita, Alexandra Maria Proca, Lukas Braun, Daniel Kunin, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Andrew M. Saxe |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Not all solutions are created equal: An analytical dissociation of functional and representational similarity in deep linear neural networksabstractA foundational principle of connectionism is that perception, action, and cognition emerge from parallel computations among simple, interconnected units that generate and rely on neural representations. Accordingly, researchers employ multivariate pattern analysis to decode and compare the neural codes of artificial and biological networks, aiming to uncover their functions. However, there is limited analytical understanding of how a network’s representation and function relate, despite this being essential to any quantitative notion of underlying function or functional similarity. We address this question using analysable two-layer linear networks and numerical simulations in nonlinear networks. We find that function and representation are dissociated, allowing representational similarity without functional similarity and vice versa. Further, we show that neither robustness to input noise nor the level of generalisation error constrain representations to the task. In contrast, networks robust to parameter noise have limited representational flexibility and must employ task-specific representations. Our findings suggest that representational alignment reflects computational advantages beyond functional alignment alone, with significant implications for interpreting and comparing the representations of connectionist systems Lukas Braun, Erin Grant, Andrew M. Saxe |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledgeabstractLearning in deep neural networks is known to depend critically on the knowledge embedded in the initial network weights. However, few theoretical results have precisely linked prior knowledge to learning dynamics. Here we derive exact solutions to the dynamics of learning with rich prior knowledge in deep linear networks by generalising Fukumizu's matrix Riccati solution \citep{fukumizu1998effect}. We obtain explicit expressions for the evolving network function, hidden representational similarity, and neural tangent kernel over training for a broad class of initialisations and tasks. The expressions reveal a class of task-independent initialisations that radically alter learning dynamics from slow non-linear dynamics to fast exponential trajectories while converging to a global optimum with identical representational similarity, dissociating learning trajectories from the structure of initial internal representations. We characterise how network weights dynamically align with task structure, rigorously justifying why previous solutions successfully described learning from small initial weights without incorporating their fine-scale structure. Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings for continual learning, reversal learning and learning of structured knowledge. Taken together, our results provide a mathematical toolkit for understanding the impact of prior knowledge on deep learning. Lukas Braun, Clémentine C. J. Dominé, James Fitzgerald, Andrew M. Saxe |
NeurIPS | 1 |