Xuanren Chen

dblp:346/2198 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 67% Internet of things and sensor networks · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 60% Environmental and earth informatics · 40%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
contrastive learning for retrieval
1.012026
FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.012026
FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.012026
FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Internet of things and sensor networks › lora networks
lora network deployment
0.712023
Link Quality Modeling for LoRa Networks in Orchards · IPSN 2023
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling
path loss modeling
0.712023
Link Quality Modeling for LoRa Networks in Orchards · IPSN 2023
Physical-layer communications › radio propagation
propagation modeling
0.712023
Link Quality Modeling for LoRa Networks in Orchards · IPSN 2023
Medical and health informatics › drug development › clinical trial › clinical trial informatics
patient-trial matching
0.312026
FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial Retrieval · ACL (1) 2026
Environmental and earth informatics › agriculture
agricultural monitoring
0.212023
Link Quality Modeling for LoRa Networks in Orchards · IPSN 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0bi-encoder · 2.0log-normal shadowing model · 1.3first fresnel zone · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FACTrial: Factorized Clinical Contrastive Training for Scalable Patient-Trial Retrieval
abstract
Patient-trial retrieval is a challenging problem that requires nuanced clinical reasoning beyond surface-level semantic similarity.However, scarce and costly relevance annotations force existing approaches to rely on very limited supervision or zero-shot transfer, reducing the task to generic semantic matching and failing to capture multi-factor eligibility reasoning.To this end, we propose FACTRIAL, a factorized contrastive training framework that leverages LLMs to synthesize diagnosisaware supervision for scalable patient-trial retrieval.FACTRIAL decomposes each patient note into a primary diagnosis and a set of concomitant, eligibility-triggering conditions, and constructs complementary contrastive signals through structured trial augmentation.Specifically, we generate primary-target and concomitant-target positives, together with clinically confusable near-miss negatives, to enforce diagnostic specificity under contrastive learning.Two specialized bi-encoder experts are trained to balance primary-diagnosis prioritization and concomitant-driven recall, and fused into a single deployable retriever.Experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that FACTRIAL achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving both top-ranked quality and high-recall coverage.
Xuanren Chen, Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen 0001, Shuai Ma 0001
ACL (1)1
2023 Link Quality Modeling for LoRa Networks in Orchards
abstract
LoRa networks have been deployed in many orchards for environmental monitoring and crop management. An accurate propagation model is essential for efficiently deploying a LoRa network in orchards, e.g., determining gateway coverage and sensor placement. Although some propagation models have been studied for LoRa networks, they are not suitable for orchard environments, because they do not consider the shadowing effect on wireless propagation caused by the ground and tree canopies. This paper presents FLog, a propagation model for LoRa signals in orchard environments. FLog leverages a unique feature of orchards, i.e., all trees have similar shapes and are planted regularly in space. We develop a 3D model of the orchards. Once we have the location of a sensor and a gateway, we know the mediums that the wireless signal traverse. Based on this knowledge, we generate the First Fresnel Zone (FFZ) between the sender and the receiver. The intrinsic path loss exponents (PLE) of all mediums can be combined into a classic Log-Normal Shadowing model in the FFZ. Extensive experiments in almond orchards show that FLog reduces the link quality estimation error by 42.7% and improves gateway coverage estimation accuracy by 70.3%, compared with a widely-used propagation model.
Kang Yang 0005, Yuning Chen, Xuanren Chen, Wan Du
IPSN3