Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taegyu Kang

dblp:346/5233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.812024
Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private query answering
private data analysis
0.812024
Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Computational geometry › topological data analysis › persistent homology
persistence diagram
0.812024
Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Computational geometry
topological data analysis
0.812024
Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 1.5exponential mechanism · 1.5distance to measure · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis
abstract
This paper is the first to attempt differentially private (DP) topological data analysis (TDA), producing near-optimal private persistence diagrams. We analyze the sensitivity of persistence diagrams in terms of the bottleneck distance, and we show that the commonly used Cech complex has sensitivity that does not decrease as the sample size $n$ increases. This makes it challenging for the persistence diagrams of Cech complexes to be privatized. As an alternative, we show that the persistence diagram obtained by the $L^1$-distance to measure (DTM) has sensitivity $O(1/n)$. Based on the sensitivity analysis, we propose using the exponential mechanism whose utility function is defined in terms of the bottleneck distance of the $L^1$-DTM persistence diagrams. We also derive upper and lower bounds of the accuracy of our privacy mechanism; the obtained bounds indicate that the privacy error of our mechanism is near-optimal. We demonstrate the performance of our privatized persistence diagrams through simulations as well as on a real data set tracking human movement.
Taegyu Kang, Sehwan Kim, Jinwon Sohn, Jordan Awan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1