Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aditya Shirwatkar

dblp:346/7605 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3852-3478ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 77% Reinforcement learning · 13% Motion planning and robot control · 10%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
quadruped locomotion
1.522025
PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2025
Force control for Robust Quadruped Locomotion: A Linear Policy Approach · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.312025
PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.212023
Force control for Robust Quadruped Locomotion: A Linear Policy Approach · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

velocity estimator · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9model predictive control · 0.9dreamer · 0.9quadratic programming · 0.7linear policy · 0.7imitation learning · 0.7centroidal dynamics MPC · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PIP-Loco: A Proprioceptive Infinite Horizon Planning Framework for Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion
abstract
A core strength of Model Predictive Control (MPC) for quadrupedal locomotion has been its ability to enforce constraints and provide interpretability of the sequence of commands over the horizon. However, despite being able to plan, MPC struggles to scale with task complexity, often failing to achieve robust behavior on rapidly changing surfaces. On the other hand, model-free Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods have outperformed MPC on multiple terrains, showing emergent motions but inherently lack any ability to handle constraints or perform planning. To address these limitations, we propose a framework that integrates proprioceptive planning with RL, allowing for agile and safe locomotion behaviors through the horizon. Inspired by MPC, we incorporate an internal model that includes a velocity estimator and a Dreamer module. During training, the framework learns an expert policy and an internal model that are co-dependent, facilitating exploration for improved locomotion behaviors. During deployment, the Dreamer module solves an infinite-horizon MPC problem, adapting actions and velocity commands to respect the constraints. We validate the robustness of our training framework through ablation studies on internal model components and demonstrate improved robustness to training noise. Finally, we evaluate our approach across multi-terrain scenarios in both simulation and hardware.
Aditya Shirwatkar, Naman Saxena, Kishore Chandra, Shishir Kolathaya
ICRA1
2023 Force control for Robust Quadruped Locomotion: A Linear Policy Approach
abstract
This work presents a simple linear policy for direct force control for quadrupedal robot locomotion. The motivation is that force control is essential for highly dynamic and agile motions. We learn a linear policy to generate end-foot trajectory parameters and a centroidal wrench, which is then distributed among the legs based on the foot contact information using a quadratic program (QP) to get the desired ground reaction forces. Unlike the majority of the existing works that use complex nonlinear function approximators to represent the RL policy or model predictive control (MPC) methods with many optimization variables in the order of hundred, our controller uses a simple linear function approximator to represent policy along with only a twelve variable QP for the force distribution. A centroidal dynamics-based MPC method is used to generate reference trajectory data, and then the linear policy is trained using imitation learning to minimize the deviations from the reference trajectory. We demonstrate this compute-efficient controller on our robot Stoch3 in simulation and real-world experiments on indoor and outdoor terrains with push recovery.
Aditya Shirwatkar, Vamshi Kumar Kurva, Devaraju Vinoda, Aditya Sagi, Himanshu Lodha, Bhavya Giri Goswami, Shivam Sood, Ketan Nehete, Shishir Kolathaya
ICRA1