Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Satoki Ishikawa

dblp:346/8912 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Learning theory · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
infinite-width limit
1.622025
Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation · ICLR 2025
On the Parameterization of Second-Order Optimization Effective towards the Infinite Width · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
local learning
0.912025
Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network parameterization
maximal update parameterization
0.912025
Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
non-contrastive learning
0.912025
PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesis · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
predictive coding networks
0.912025
Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation collapse
0.912025
PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesis · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
target propagation
0.912025
Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.812024
On the Parameterization of Second-Order Optimization Effective towards the Infinite Width · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning
0.312025
PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesis · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stop-gradient · 0.9predictive coding · 0.9momentum encoder · 0.9mean-field theory · 0.9gauss-newton approximation · 0.9shampoo · 0.8maximal update parametrization · 0.8K-FAC · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PhiNets: Brain-inspired Non-contrastive Learning Based on Temporal Prediction Hypothesis
abstract
Predictive coding has been established as a promising neuroscientific theory to describe the mechanism of information processing in the retina or cortex. This theory hypothesises that cortex predicts sensory inputs at various levels of abstraction to minimise prediction errors. Inspired by predictive coding, Chen et al. (2024) proposed another theory, temporal prediction hypothesis, to claim that sequence memory residing in hippocampus has emerged through predicting input signals from the past sensory inputs. Specifically, they supposed that the CA3 predictor in hippocampus creates synaptic delay between input signals, which is compensated by the following CA1 predictor. Though recorded neural activities were replicated based on the temporal prediction hypothesis, its validity has not been fully explored. In this work, we aim to explore the temporal prediction hypothesis from the perspective of self-supervised learning (SSL). Specifically, we focus on non-contrastive learning, which generates two augmented views of an input image and predicts one from another. Non-contrastive learning is intimately related to the temporal prediction hypothesis because the synaptic delay is implicitly created by StopGradient. Building upon a popular non-contrastive learner, SimSiam, we propose PhiNet, an extension of SimSiam to have two predictors explicitly corresponding to the CA3 and CA1, respectively. Through studying the PhiNet model, we discover two findings. First, meaningful data representations emerge in PhiNet more stably than in SimSiam. This is initially supported by our learning dynamics analysis: PhiNet is more robust to the representational collapse. Second, PhiNet adapts more quickly to newly incoming patterns in online and continual learning scenarios. For practitioners, we additionally propose an extension called X-PhiNet integrated with a momentum encoder, excelling in continual learning. All in all, our work reveals that the temporal prediction hypothesis is a reasonable model in terms of the robustness and adaptivity.
Satoki Ishikawa, Makoto Yamada, Han Bao 0002, Yuki Takezawa
ICLR1
2025 Local Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation
abstract
Local learning, which trains a network through layer-wise local targets and losses, has been studied as an alternative to backpropagation (BP) in neural computation. However, its algorithms often become more complex or require additional hyperparameters due to the locality, making it challenging to identify desirable settings where the algorithm progresses in a stable manner. To provide theoretical and quantitative insights, we introduce maximal update parameterization ($\mu$P) in the infinite-width limit for two representative designs of local targets: predictive coding (PC) and target propagation (TP). We verify that $\mu$P enables hyperparameter transfer across models of different widths. Furthermore, our analysis reveals unique and intriguing properties of $\mu$P that are not present in conventional BP. By analyzing deep linear networks, we find that PC's gradients interpolate between first-order and Gauss-Newton-like gradients, depending on the parameterization. We demonstrate that, in specific standard settings, PC in the infinite-width limit behaves more similarly to the first-order gradient. For TP, even with the standard scaling of the last layer differing from classical $\mu$P, its local loss optimization favors the feature learning regime over the kernel regime.
Satoki Ishikawa, Rio Yokota, Ryo Karakida
ICLR1
2024 On the Parameterization of Second-Order Optimization Effective towards the Infinite Width
abstract
Second-order optimization has been developed to accelerate the training of deep neural networks and it is being applied to increasingly larger-scale models. In this study, towards training on further larger scales, we identify a specific parameterization for second-order optimization that promotes feature learning in a stable manner even if the network width increases significantly. Inspired by a maximal update parametrization, we consider a one-step update of the gradient and reveal the appropriate scales of hyperparameters including random initialization, learning rates, and damping terms. Our approach covers two major second-order optimization algorithms, K-FAC and Shampoo, and we demonstrate that our parametrization achieves higher generalization performance in feature learning. In particular, it enables us to transfer the hyperparameters across models with different widths.
Satoki Ishikawa, Ryo Karakida
ICLR1