Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mattia Opper
dblp:347/1254
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-9065-8812ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 37% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 15% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
efficient language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Banyan: Improved Representation Learning with Explicit Structure · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Banyan: Improved Representation Learning with Explicit Structure · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
low-resource language modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Banyan: Improved Representation Learning with Explicit Structure · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
structured representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Banyan: Improved Representation Learning with Explicit Structure · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree Operations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree Operations · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pretrained embeddings |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | StrAE: Autoencoding for Pre-Trained Embeddings using Explicit Structure · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical tree structure · 0.9diagonalized message passing · 0.9sparse vector representation · 0.8neural network · 0.8localised-merge algorithm · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7autoencoding · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Banyan: Improved Representation Learning with Explicit StructureabstractWe present Banyan, a model that efficiently learns semantic representations by leveraging explicit hierarchical structure. While transformers excel at scale, they struggle in low-resource settings. Conversely recent structured models have shown promise as efficient learners, but lack performance. Banyan bridges this gap with two key innovations: an entangled hierarchical tree structure and diagonalized message passing, enabling it to outperform larger transformer models with just 14 non-embedding parameters. It excels in low-resource settings, offering a viable alternative for under-represented languages and highlighting its potential for efficient, interpretable NLP in resource-constrained environments. Mattia Opper, N. Siddharth 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Mechanisms of Symbol Processing for In-Context Learning in Transformer NetworksabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive abilities in symbol processing through in-context learning (ICL). This success flies in the face of decades of critiques asserting that artificial neural networks cannot master abstract symbol manipulation. We seek to understand the mechanisms that can enable robust symbol processing in transformer networks, illuminating both the unanticipated success, and the significant limitations, of transformers in symbol processing. Borrowing insights from symbolic AI and cognitive science on the power of Production System architectures, we develop a high-level Production System Language, PSL, that allows us to write symbolic programs to do complex, abstract symbol processing, and create compilers that precisely implement PSL programs in transformer networks which are, by construction, 100% mechanistically interpretable. The work is driven by study of a purely abstract (semantics-free) symbolic task that we develop, Templatic Generation (TGT). Although developed through study of TGT, PSL is, we demonstrate, highly general: it is Turing Universal. The new type of transformer architecture that we compile from PSL programs suggests a number of paths for enhancing transformers’ capabilities at symbol processing. We note, however, that the work we report addresses computability, and not learnability, by transformer networks. Paul Smolensky, Roland Fernandez, Zhenghao Herbert Zhou, Mattia Opper, Adam Davies, Jianfeng Gao 0001 |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 4 |
| 2024 | Starting Small, After All? Curriculum Learning with Child-Directed Speech
Mattia Opper, Sydelle de Souza |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2024 | Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree OperationsabstractNeural networks continue to struggle with compositional generalization, and this issue is exacerbated by a lack of massive pre-training. One successful approach for developing neural systems which exhibit human-like compositional generalization is $\textit{hybrid}$ neurosymbolic techniques. However, these techniques run into the core issues that plague symbolic approaches to AI: scalability and flexibility. The reason for this failure is that at their core, hybrid neurosymbolic models perform symbolic computation and relegate the scalable and flexible neural computation to parameterizing a symbolic system. We investigate a $\textit{unified}$ neurosymbolic system where transformations in the network can be interpreted simultaneously as both symbolic and neural computation. We extend a unified neurosymbolic architecture called the Differentiable Tree Machine in two central ways. First, we significantly increase the model’s efficiency through the use of sparse vector representations of symbolic structures. Second, we enable its application beyond the restricted set of tree2tree problems to the more general class of seq2seq problems. The improved model retains its prior generalization capabilities and, since there is a fully neural path through the network, avoids the pitfalls of other neurosymbolic techniques that elevate symbolic computation over neural computation. Paul Soulos, Henry Conklin, Mattia Opper, Paul Smolensky, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Roland Fernandez |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | StrAE: Autoencoding for Pre-Trained Embeddings using Explicit StructureabstractThis work presents StrAE: a Structured Autoencoder framework that through strict adherence to explicit structure, and use of a novel contrastive objective over tree-structured representations, enables effective learning of multi-level representations.Through comparison over different forms of structure, we verify that our results are directly attributable to the informativeness of the structure provided as input, and show that this is not the case for existing tree models.We then further extend StrAE to allow the model to define its own compositions using a simple localised-merge algorithm.This variant, called Self-StrAE, outperforms baselines that don't involve explicit hierarchical compositions, and is comparable to models given informative structure (e.g.constituency parses).Our experiments are conducted in a data-constrained (≈10M tokens) setting to help tease apart the contribution of the inductive bias to effective learning.However, we find that this framework can be robust to scale, and when extended to a much larger dataset (≈100M tokens), our 430 parameter model performs comparably to a 6-layer RoBERTa many orders of magnitude larger in size.Our findings support the utility of incorporating explicit composition as an inductive bias for effective representation learning. Mattia Opper, Victor Prokhorov, N. Siddharth 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |