Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingxiao Wei
dblp:347/7692
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
location privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › local differential privacy
randomized response |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
spatial crowdsourcing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized matrix multiplication · 0.7approximation algorithm · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial CrowdsourcingabstractSpatial Crowdsourcing (SC) has been adopted in various applications such as Gigwalk and Uber, where a platform takes location-based tasks (e.g., picking up passengers) from a requester and selects suitable workers to perform them. In most existing works, the platform selects workers based on the requester and worker information, which suffers from serious privacy issues. Some works have considered privacy issues, but they still suffer from either of two limitations: (i) Privacy of the requester and worker cannot be protected simultaneously; (ii) Third-party trusted entities are usually required. Motivated by this, we focus on protecting the privacy of both the requester and the worker without third-party entities while selecting workers. We use randomized response, a widely recognized and prevalent privacy model achieving Local Differential Privacy (LDP), to jointly protect the privacy of workers’ locations and charges based on the location-charge correlation. For the requester, we present a novel mechanism called randomized matrix multiplication to hide the real task locations. More importantly, we prove that the worker selection based on the protected information is non-submodular and NP-hard, which cannot be addressed in polynomial time. To this end, we present an approximate algorithm to solve the problem efficiently, of which the effectiveness is measured by the approximation ratio, i.e., the ratio of the optimal solution to the approximate solution. Finally, simulations based on real-world datasets illustrate that our worker selection outperforms the state-of-the-art method on both privacy protection and worker selection. Hengzhi Wang, Yongjian Yang 0001, En Wang, Xiulong Liu 0001, Jingxiao Wei, Jie Wu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 5 |