Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingxiao Wei

dblp:347/7692 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.712023
Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy
0.712023
Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Privacy and data protection
location privacy
0.712023
Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › local differential privacy
randomized response
0.712023
Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
spatial crowdsourcing
0.712023
Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized matrix multiplication · 0.7approximation algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Bilateral Privacy-Preserving Worker Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing
abstract
Spatial Crowdsourcing (SC) has been adopted in various applications such as Gigwalk and Uber, where a platform takes location-based tasks (e.g., picking up passengers) from a requester and selects suitable workers to perform them. In most existing works, the platform selects workers based on the requester and worker information, which suffers from serious privacy issues. Some works have considered privacy issues, but they still suffer from either of two limitations: (i) Privacy of the requester and worker cannot be protected simultaneously; (ii) Third-party trusted entities are usually required. Motivated by this, we focus on protecting the privacy of both the requester and the worker without third-party entities while selecting workers. We use randomized response, a widely recognized and prevalent privacy model achieving Local Differential Privacy (LDP), to jointly protect the privacy of workers’ locations and charges based on the location-charge correlation. For the requester, we present a novel mechanism called randomized matrix multiplication to hide the real task locations. More importantly, we prove that the worker selection based on the protected information is non-submodular and NP-hard, which cannot be addressed in polynomial time. To this end, we present an approximate algorithm to solve the problem efficiently, of which the effectiveness is measured by the approximation ratio, i.e., the ratio of the optimal solution to the approximate solution. Finally, simulations based on real-world datasets illustrate that our worker selection outperforms the state-of-the-art method on both privacy protection and worker selection.
Hengzhi Wang, Yongjian Yang 0001, En Wang, Xiulong Liu 0001, Jingxiao Wei, Jie Wu 0001
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.5