Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adrian Atienza

dblp:347/8343 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Time series and sequential data · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › biomedical signal processing › physiological signal analysis
cardiac signal analysis
0.912025
Parallel-Learning of Invariant and Tempo-variant Attributes of Single-Lead Cardiac Signals: PLITA · AAAI 2025
Medical and health informatics
electrocardiogram analysis
0.912025
Parallel-Learning of Invariant and Tempo-variant Attributes of Single-Lead Cardiac Signals: PLITA · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.812024
Contrastive Learning Is Not Optimal for Quasiperiodic Time Series · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series learning
0.812024
Contrastive Learning Is Not Optimal for Quasiperiodic Time Series · IJCAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 2.5self-supervised learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Parallel-Learning of Invariant and Tempo-variant Attributes of Single-Lead Cardiac Signals: PLITA
abstract
Wearable sensing devices, such as Holter monitors, will play a crucial role in the future of digital health. Unsupervised learning frameworks such as Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) are essential to map these single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals with their anticipated clinical outcomes. These signals are characterized by a tempo-variant component whose patterns evolve through the recording and an invariant component with patterns that remain unchanged. However, existing SSL methods only drive the model to encode the invariant attributes, leading the model to neglect tempo-variant information which reflects subject-state changes through time. In this paper, we present Parallel-Learning of Invariant and Tempo-variant Attributes (PLITA), a novel SSL method designed for capturing both invariant and tempo-variant ECG attributes. The latter are captured by mandating closer representations in space for closer inputs on time. We evaluate both the capability of the method to learn the attributes of these two distinct kinds, as well as PLITA ’s performance compared to existing SSL methods for ECG analysis. PLITA performs significantly better in the set-ups where tempo-variant attributes play a major role.
Adrian Atienza, Jakob E. Bardram, Sadasivan Puthusserypady
AAAI1
2024 Contrastive Learning Is Not Optimal for Quasiperiodic Time Series
Adrian Atienza, Jakob E. Bardram, Sadasivan Puthusserypady
IJCAI1