Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noam Elata
dblp:347/9215
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-2692-2781ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 62% 3D vision · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 50% Rendering · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Novel View Synthesis with Pixel-Space Diffusion Models · CVPR 2025 Classification Diffusion Models: Revitalizing Density Ratio Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Novel View Synthesis with Pixel-Space Diffusion Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Diffusion Models: Revitalizing Density Ratio Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
likelihood-based generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Classification Diffusion Models: Revitalizing Density Ratio Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Rendering › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Compressed Sensing with Diffusion-Based Posterior Sampling · ECCV (78) 2024 |
Image and video processing
compressive sensing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Compressed Sensing with Diffusion-Based Posterior Sampling · ECCV (78) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › inverse problem solving
diffusion-based inverse problem solving |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Compressed Sensing with Diffusion-Based Posterior Sampling · ECCV (78) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion-based posterior sampling · 1.5compressed sensing · 1.5pixel-space generation · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9noise-level classification · 0.8density ratio estimation · 0.8denoising diffusion · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Novel View Synthesis with Pixel-Space Diffusion ModelsabstractSynthesizing a novel view from a single input image is a challenging task. Traditionally, this task was approached by estimating scene depth, warping, and inpainting, with machine learning models enabling parts of the pipeline. More recently, generative models are being increasingly employed in novel view synthesis (NVS), often encompassing the entire end-to-end system. In this work, we adapt a modern diffusion model architecture for end-to-end NVS in the pixel space, substantially outperforming previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) techniques. We explore different ways to encode geometric information into the network. Our experiments show that while these methods may enhance performance, their impact is minor compared to utilizing improved generative models. Moreover, we introduce a novel NVS training scheme that utilizes single-view datasets, capitalizing on their relative abundance compared to their multi-view counterparts. This leads to improved generalization capabilities to scenes with out-of-domain content.1 Noam Elata, Bahjat Kawar, Yaron Ostrovsky-Berman, Miriam Farber, Ron Sokolovsky |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | InvFusion: Bridging Supervised and Zero-shot Diffusion for Inverse ProblemsabstractDiffusion Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in handling inverse problems, offering high-quality posterior-sampling-based solutions. Despite significant advances, a fundamental trade-off persists regarding the way the conditioned synthesis is employed: Zero-shot approaches can accommodate any linear degradation but rely on approximations that reduce accuracy. In contrast, training-based methods model the posterior correctly, but cannot adapt to the degradation at test-time. Here we introduce InvFusion, the first training-based degradation-aware posterior sampler. InvFusion combines the best of both worlds - the strong performance of supervised approaches and the flexibility of zero-shot methods. This is achieved through a novel architectural design that seamlessly integrates the degradation operator directly into the diffusion denoiser. We compare InvFusion against existing general-purpose posterior samplers, both degradation-aware zero-shot techniques and blind training-based methods. Experiments on the FFHQ and ImageNet datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance. Beyond posterior sampling, we further demonstrate the applicability of our architecture, operating as a general Minimum Mean Square Error predictor, and as a Neural Posterior Principal Component estimator. Noam Elata, Hyungjin Chung, Jong Chul Ye, Tomer Michaeli, Miki Elad |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Adaptive Compressed Sensing with Diffusion-Based Posterior Sampling
Noam Elata, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad |
ECCV (78) | 1 |
| 2024 | Classification Diffusion Models: Revitalizing Density Ratio EstimationabstractA prominent family of methods for learning data distributions relies on density ratio estimation (DRE), where a model is trained to *classify* between data samples and samples from some reference distribution. DRE-based models can directly output the likelihood for any given input, a highly desired property that is lacking in most generative techniques. Nevertheless, to date, DRE methods have failed in accurately capturing the distributions of complex high-dimensional data, like images, and have thus been drawing reduced research attention in recent years.
In this work we present *classification diffusion models* (CDMs), a DRE-based generative method that adopts the formalism of denoising diffusion models (DDMs) while making use of a classifier that predicts the level of noise added to a clean signal. Our method is based on an analytical connection that we derive between the MSE-optimal denoiser for removing white Gaussian noise and the cross-entropy-optimal classifier for predicting the noise level. Our method is the first DRE-based technique that can successfully generate images beyond the MNIST dataset. Furthermore, it can output the likelihood of any input in a single forward pass, achieving state-of-the-art negative log likelihood (NLL) among methods with this property. Shahar Yadin, Noam Elata, Tomer Michaeli |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Nested Diffusion Processes for Anytime Image GenerationabstractDiffusion models are the current state-of-the-art in image generation, synthesizing high-quality images by breaking down the generation process into many fine-grained denoising steps. Despite their good performance, diffusion models are computationally expensive, requiring many neural function evaluations (NFEs). In this work, we propose an anytime diffusion-based method that can generate viable images when stopped at arbitrary times before completion. Using existing pretrained diffusion models, we show that the generation scheme can be recomposed as two nested diffusion processes, enabling fast iterative refinement of a generated image. In experiments on ImageNet and Stable Diffusion-based text-to-image generation, we show, both qualitatively and quantitatively, that our method’s intermediate generation quality greatly exceeds that of the original diffusion model, while the final generation result remains comparable. We illustrate the applicability of Nested Diffusion in several settings, including for solving inverse problems, and for rapid text-based content creation by allowing user intervention throughout the sampling process.1 Noam Elata, Bahjat Kawar, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad |
WACV | 1 |