Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Toni J. B. Liu
dblp:348/5536
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Density estimation with LLMs: a geometric investigation of in-context learning trajectories · ICLR 2025 LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling law · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Density estimation with LLMs: a geometric investigation of in-context learning trajectories · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
embedding geometry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lines of Thought in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
kernel density estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Density estimation with LLMs: a geometric investigation of in-context learning trajectories · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › transformer analysis
transformer representations |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Lines of Thought in Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shadow Cones: A Generalized Framework for Partial Order Embeddings · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
dynamical systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling law · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Coneheads: Hierarchy Aware Attention · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Coneheads: Hierarchy Aware Attention · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
hyperbolic attention |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Coneheads: Hierarchy Aware Attention · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining › authorship analysis
authorship attribution |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddings · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probability density extraction · 1.5neural scaling laws · 1.5transformer layer analysis · 0.9stochastic differential equation · 0.9manifold learning · 0.9latent space geometry · 0.9kernel density estimation · 0.9intensive principal component analysis · 0.9shadow cone construction · 0.8poincaré ball embedding · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddingsabstractLarge language models use high-dimensional latent spaces to encode and process textual information.Much work has investigated how the conceptual content of words translates into geometrical relationships between their vector representations.Fewer studies analyze how the cumulative information of an entire prompt becomes condensed into individual embeddings under the action of transformer layers.We use literary pieces to show that information about intangible, rather than factual, aspects of the prompt are contained in deep representations.We observe that short excerpts (10 -100 tokens) from different novels separate in the latent space independently from what next-token prediction they converge towards.Ensembles from books from the same authors are much more entangled than across authors, suggesting that embeddings encode stylistic features.This geometry of style may have applications for authorship attribution and literary analysis, but most importantly reveals the sophistication of information processing and compression accomplished by language models. Raphaël Sarfati, Haley Moller, Toni J. B. Liu, Nicolas Boullé, Christopher J. Earls |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2025 | Density estimation with LLMs: a geometric investigation of in-context learning trajectoriesabstractLarge language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable emergent abilities to perform in-context learning across various tasks, including time series forecasting.
This work investigates LLMs' ability to estimate probability density functions (PDFs) from data observed in-context;
such density estimation (DE) is a fundamental task underlying many probabilistic modeling problems.
We leverage the Intensive Principal Component Analysis (InPCA) to visualize and analyze the in-context learning dynamics of LLaMA-2 models.
Our main finding is that these LLMs all follow similar learning trajectories in a low-dimensional InPCA space, which are distinct from those of traditional density estimation methods like histograms and Gaussian kernel density estimation (KDE).
We interpret the LLaMA in-context DE process as a KDE with an adaptive kernel width and shape.
This custom kernel model captures a significant portion of LLaMA's behavior despite having only two parameters.
We further speculate on why LLaMA's kernel width and shape differs from classical algorithms, providing insights into the mechanism of in-context probabilistic reasoning in LLMs.
Our codebase, along with a 3D visualization of an LLM's in-context learning trajectory, is publicly available at https://github.com/AntonioLiu97/LLMICL_inPCA. Toni J. B. Liu, Nicolas Boullé, Raphaël Sarfati, Christopher J. Earls |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Lines of Thought in Large Language ModelsabstractLarge Language Models achieve next-token prediction by transporting a vectorized piece of text (prompt) across an accompanying embedding space under the action of successive transformer layers. The resulting high-dimensional trajectories realize different contextualization, or 'thinking', steps, and fully determine the output probability distribution. We aim to characterize the statistical properties of ensembles of these 'lines of thought.' We observe that independent trajectories cluster along a low-dimensional, non-Euclidean manifold, and that their path can be well approximated by a stochastic equation with few parameters extracted from data. We find it remarkable that the vast complexity of such large models can be reduced to a much simpler form, and we reflect on implications. Raphaël Sarfati, Toni J. B. Liu, Nicolas Boullé, Christopher J. Earls |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | LLMs learn governing principles of dynamical systems, revealing an in-context neural scaling lawabstractWe study LLMs' ability to extrapolate the behavior of various dynamical systems, including stochastic, chaotic, continuous, and discrete systems, whose evolution is governed by principles of physical interest.Our results show that LLaMA-2, a language model trained on text, achieves accurate predictions of dynamical system time series without fine-tuning or prompt engineering.Moreover, the accuracy of the learned physical rules increases with the length of the input context window, revealing an in-context version of a neural scaling law.Along the way, we present a flexible and efficient algorithm for extracting probability density functions of multi-digit numbers directly from LLMs. 1 Toni J. B. Liu, Nicolas Boullé, Raphaël Sarfati, Christopher J. Earls |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Shadow Cones: A Generalized Framework for Partial Order EmbeddingsabstractHyperbolic space has proven to be well-suited for capturing hierarchical relations in data, such as trees and directed acyclic graphs. Prior work introduced the concept of entailment cones, which uses partial orders defined by nested cones in the Poincar\'e ball to model hierarchies. Here, we introduce the ``shadow cones" framework, a physics-inspired entailment cone construction. Specifically, we model partial orders as subset relations between shadows formed by a light source and opaque objects in hyperbolic space. The shadow cones framework generalizes entailment cones to a broad class of formulations and hyperbolic space models beyond the Poincar\'e ball. This results in clear advantages over existing constructions: for example, shadow cones possess better optimization properties over constructions limited to the Poincar\'e ball. Our experiments on datasets of various sizes and hierarchical structures show that shadow cones consistently and significantly outperform existing entailment cone constructions. These results indicate that shadow cones are an effective way to model partial orders in hyperbolic space, offering physically intuitive and novel insights about the nature of such structures. Toni J. B. Liu, Albert Tseng, Christopher De Sa |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Coneheads: Hierarchy Aware AttentionabstractAttention networks such as transformers have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many domains.
These networks rely heavily on the dot product attention operator, which computes the similarity between two points by taking their inner product.
However, the inner product does not explicitly model the complex structural properties of real world datasets, such as hierarchies between data points.
To remedy this, we introduce cone attention, a drop-in replacement for dot product attention based on hyperbolic entailment cones.
Cone attention associates two points by the depth of their lowest common ancestor in a hierarchy defined by hyperbolic cones, which intuitively measures the divergence of two points and gives a $\textit{hierarchy aware}$ similarity score.
We test cone attention on a wide variety of models and tasks and show that it improves task-level performance over dot product attention and other baselines, and is able to match dot-product attention with significantly fewer parameters.
Our results suggest that cone attention is an effective way to capture hierarchical relationships when calculating attention. Albert Tseng, Toni J. B. Liu, Christopher De Sa |
NeurIPS | 3 |