EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ales Kubicek
dblp:348/5541
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-9579-8098ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 81% Graph learning · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 29% Parallel and multicore computing · 29% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 25% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CrossPipe: Towards Optimal Pipeline Schedules for Cross-Datacenter Training · USENIX ATC 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling
pipeline scheduling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CrossPipe: Towards Optimal Pipeline Schedules for Cross-Datacenter Training · USENIX ATC 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph prompt learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models · AAAI 2024 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A High-Performance Design, Implementation, Deployment, and Evaluation of The Slim Fly Network · NSDI 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud networking
inter-datacenter network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | CrossPipe: Towards Optimal Pipeline Schedules for Cross-Datacenter Training · USENIX ATC 2025 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputing systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A High-Performance Design, Implementation, Deployment, and Evaluation of The Slim Fly Network · NSDI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree-of-thoughts · 1.6chain-of-thought · 1.6graph of thoughts · 0.9performance evaluation · 0.8network design · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Spritz: Path-Aware Load Balancing in Low-Diameter Networks
Tommaso Bonato, Ales Kubicek, Abdul Kabbani, Ahmad Ghalayini, Maciej Besta, Torsten Hoefler |
IPDPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees on Star ProductsabstractA star-product operation may be used to create large graphs from smaller factor graphs. Network topologies based on star-products demonstrate several advantages including lowdiameter, high scalability, modularity and others. Many state-of-the-art diameter-2 and −3 topologies (Slim Fly, Bundlefly, PolarStar etc.) can be represented as star products. In this paper, we explore constructions of edge-disjoint spanning trees (EDSTs) in star-product topologies. EDSTs expose multiple parallel disjoint pathways in the network and can be leveraged to accelerate collective communication, enhance fault tolerance and network recovery, and manage congestion. Our EDSTs have provably maximum or near-maximum cardinality which amplifies their benefits. We further analyze their depths and show that for one of our constructions, all trees have order of the depth of the EDSTs of the factor graphs, and for all other constructions, a large subset of the trees have that depth. Kelly Isham, Laura Monroe, Kartik Lakhotia, Aleyah Dawkins, Daniel Hwang, Ales Kubicek |
IPDPS | 6 |
| 2025 | CrossPipe: Towards Optimal Pipeline Schedules for Cross-Datacenter Training
Tiancheng Chen, Ales Kubicek, Langwen Huang, Torsten Hoefler |
USENIX ATC | 2 |
| 2025 | Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of ThoughtsabstractThe field of natural language processing (NLP) has witnessed significant progress in recent years, with a notable focus on improving large language models' (LLM) performance through innovative prompting techniques. Among these, prompt engineering coupled with structures has emerged as a promising paradigm, with designs such as Chain-of-Thought, Tree of Thoughts, or Graph of Thoughts, in which the overall LLM reasoning is guided by a structure such as a graph. As illustrated with numerous examples, this paradigm significantly enhances the LLM's capability to solve numerous tasks, ranging from logical or mathematical reasoning to planning or creative writing. To facilitate the understanding of this growing field and pave the way for future developments, we devise a general blueprint for effective and efficient LLM reasoning schemes. For this, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the prompt execution pipeline, clarifying and clearly defining different concepts. We then build the first taxonomy of structure-enhanced LLM reasoning schemes. We focus on identifying fundamental classes of harnessed structures, and we analyze the representations of these structures, algorithms executed with these structures, and many others. We refer to these structures as reasoning topologies, because their representation becomes to a degree spatial, as they are contained within the LLM context. Our study compares existing prompting schemes using the proposed taxonomy, discussing how certain design choices lead to different patterns in performance and cost. We also outline theoretical underpinnings, relationships between prompting and other parts of the LLM ecosystem such as knowledge bases, and the associated research challenges. Our work will help to advance future prompt engineering techniques. Maciej Besta, Florim Memedi, Robert Gerstenberger, Guangyuan Piao, Nils Blach, Piotr Nyczyk, Marcin Copik, Grzegorz Kwasniewski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Ales Kubicek, Hubert Niewiadomski, Aidan O'Mahony, Onur Mutlu, Torsten Hoefler |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 12 |
| 2024 | Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsabstractWe introduce Graph of Thoughts (GoT): a framework that advances prompting capabilities in large language models (LLMs) beyond those offered by paradigms such as Chain-of-Thought or Tree of Thoughts (ToT). The key idea and primary advantage of GoT is the ability to model the information generated by an LLM as an arbitrary graph, where units of information ("LLM thoughts") are vertices, and edges correspond to dependencies between these vertices. This approach enables combining arbitrary LLM thoughts into synergistic outcomes, distilling the essence of whole networks of thoughts, or enhancing thoughts using feedback loops. We illustrate that GoT offers advantages over state of the art on different tasks, for example increasing the quality of sorting by 62% over ToT, while simultaneously reducing costs by >31%. We ensure that GoT is extensible with new thought transformations and thus can be used to spearhead new prompting schemes. This work brings the LLM reasoning closer to human thinking or brain mechanisms such as recurrence, both of which form complex networks Maciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger, Michal Podstawski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Joanna Gajda, Tomasz Lehmann, Hubert Niewiadomski, Piotr Nyczyk, Torsten Hoefler |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2024 | A High-Performance Design, Implementation, Deployment, and Evaluation of The Slim Fly Network
Nils Blach, Maciej Besta, Daniele De Sensi, Jens Domke, Hussein Harake, Shigang Li 0002, Patrick Iff, Marek Konieczny, Kartik Lakhotia, Ales Kubicek, Marcel Ferrari, Fabrizio Petrini, Torsten Hoefler |
NSDI | 10 |