Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aathira Manoj
dblp:348/5555
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 44% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 44% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › distributed randomness
distributed randomness beacon |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SoK: Distributed Randomness Beacons · SP 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pseudorandom functions
verifiable random functions |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SoK: Distributed Randomness Beacons · SP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematization of knowledge · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | SoK: Distributed Randomness BeaconsabstractMotivated and inspired by the emergence of blockchains, many new protocols have recently been proposed for generating publicly verifiable randomness in a distributed yet secure fashion. These protocols work under different setups and assumptions, use various cryptographic tools, and entail unique trade-offs and characteristics. In this paper, we systematize the design of distributed randomness beacons (DRBs) as well as the cryptographic building blocks they rely on. We evaluate protocols on two key security properties, unbiasability and unpredictability, and discuss common attack vectors for predicting or biasing the beacon output and the countermeasures employed by protocols. We also compare protocols by communication and computational efficiency. Finally, we provide insights on the applicability of different protocols in various deployment scenarios and highlight possible directions for further research. Kevin Choi, Aathira Manoj, Joseph Bonneau |
SP | 2 |