Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kouroche Bouchiat
dblp:348/5641
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › interpretable neural network
neural additive models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
marginal likelihood · 0.8laplace approximation · 0.8empirical bayes · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian PrinciplesabstractNeural additive models (NAMs) enhance the transparency of deep neural networks by handling input features in separate additive sub-networks. However, they lack inherent mechanisms that provide calibrated uncertainties and enable selection of relevant features and interactions. Approaching NAMs from a Bayesian perspective, we augment them in three primary ways, namely by a) providing credible intervals for the individual additive sub-networks; b) estimating the marginal likelihood to perform an implicit selection of features via an empirical Bayes procedure; and c) facilitating the ranking of feature pairs as candidates for second-order interaction in fine-tuned models. In particular, we develop Laplace-approximated NAMs (LA-NAMs), which show improved empirical performance on tabular datasets and challenging real-world medical tasks. Kouroche Bouchiat, Alexander Immer, Hugo Yèche, Gunnar Rätsch, Vincent Fortuin |
ICML | 1 |